This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Add type hints for account validity handler #8620
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5b4a170
Add type hints for account validity.
clokep f2e9749
Fix some optional strings.
clokep f7c85d1
Not all accounts expire.
clokep 92431da
Add a newsfragment.
clokep e33fb09
Raise an error instead of silently failing.
clokep a3b6bf9
Clarify changelog.
clokep 17d5c53
Lint
clokep File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -236,13 +236,13 @@ async def get_renewal_token_for_user(self, user_id: str) -> str: | |
desc="get_renewal_token_for_user", | ||
) | ||
|
||
async def get_users_expiring_soon(self) -> List[Dict[str, int]]: | ||
async def get_users_expiring_soon(self) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]: | ||
"""Selects users whose account will expire in the [now, now + renew_at] time | ||
window (see configuration for account_validity for information on what renew_at | ||
refers to). | ||
|
||
Returns: | ||
A list of dictionaries mapping user ID to expiration time (in milliseconds). | ||
A list of dictionaries, each with a user ID and expiration time (in milliseconds). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This comment seemed entirely wrong, it becomes a list of dictionaries like Although converting this to be a flat dictionary like |
||
""" | ||
|
||
def select_users_txn(txn, now_ms, renew_at): | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or perhaps this should just raise an error instead of silently ignoring it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeahhh, it's probably poor form to return a
200 OK
for a request that will never actually send the email.At the same time, I could see raising an error potentially breaking someone's script that just loops over their entire userbase.
Perhaps we can raise an error and put out a notice in the release notes just in case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I decided to make the changelog entry into a bugfix about this instead. Hopefully that's enough of a notice?