-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
possible bug #4
Comments
Thanks for your comment. At first res block, x_latent is returned "if j == 0: x_latent = res_blck(latent_x)", then for next blocks I use x_latent. It is bad naming i agree, but it looks not an implementation bug to me. |
the line I pointed to is NOT under |
As far as I understand, for j>0 you do not process the *processed*, you
process *the same* encoder output `latent_x`with a new residual block.
Thefore, the output of the previous residual block in the decoder row is
just unemployed.
ср, 16 мар. 2022 г., 20:04 Mahmoud Afifi ***@***.***>:
… yes I understand your point. Res_blocks are arranged horizontally. Each
row received the processed latent from encoder and process it sequentially.
If we are at the beginning of the row, then we retrieve the encoder latent
of this row once and process it, otherwise we process the processed latent
in this row:
if j == 0:
latent_x = latent_forward[k]
x_latent = res_blck(latent_x)
Makes sense?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACV4QJMW4L66KY26TG37UJDVAIIBDANCNFSM5Q332ESA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I checked the code carefully and yes you are right. It should be |
Updated readme and referred to this issue. Thanks @denkorzh! |
You're welcome! |
mixedillWB/src/gridnet.py
Line 150 in aeee3b8
You seem to use the same
latent_x
for all columns of the decoder part. I suggest this is a bug in your implementation of GridNet.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: