Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace 'static::' with 'self::' when accessing private const. #30774

Conversation

vovayatsyuk
Copy link
Member

@vovayatsyuk vovayatsyuk commented Nov 4, 2020

Description

This PR prevents 'Undefined class constant' error if a plugin will be added for one of these classes. Example:

Related Pull Requests

#28797
#29925

Related Issues

  1. Do not recommend using static:: for private constants magento-coding-standard#197

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)

Resolved issues:

  1. resolves [Issue] Replace 'static::' with 'self::' when accessing private const. #30781: Replace 'static::' with 'self::' when accessing private const.

This will prevent 'Undefined class constant' error if a plugin will be
added for one of these classes.
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Nov 4, 2020

Hi @vovayatsyuk. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento give me 2.4-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

❗ Automated tests can be triggered manually with an appropriate comment:

  • @magento run all tests - run or re-run all required tests against the PR changes
  • @magento run <test-build(s)> - run or re-run specific test build(s)
    For example: @magento run Unit Tests

<test-build(s)> is a comma-separated list of build names. Allowed build names are:

  1. Database Compare
  2. Functional Tests CE
  3. Functional Tests EE,
  4. Functional Tests B2B
  5. Integration Tests
  6. Magento Health Index
  7. Sample Data Tests CE
  8. Sample Data Tests EE
  9. Sample Data Tests B2B
  10. Static Tests
  11. Unit Tests
  12. WebAPI Tests

You can find more information about the builds here

ℹ️ Please run only needed test builds instead of all when developing. Please run all test builds before sending your PR for review.

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Guide documentation.

⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all Pull Requests must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.

🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.

📞 The triage of Pull Requests happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, please join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

🎥 You can find the recording of the previous Community Contributions Triage on the Magento Youtube Channel

✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel

@ihor-sviziev
Copy link
Contributor

@magento run all tests

@ihor-sviziev ihor-sviziev added Auto-Tests: Not Required Changes in Pull Request does not require coverage by auto-tests Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround. Award: bug fix labels Nov 4, 2020
@ihor-sviziev
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vovayatsyuk,
Will you be able to contribute static test for such case in order not to have such new cases in future?

@ihor-sviziev
Copy link
Contributor

@magento run Functional Tests EE

@ihor-sviziev
Copy link
Contributor

@magento create issue

@vovayatsyuk
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, sure. I'll try in a few days.

@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot added the Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. label Nov 4, 2020
@ihor-sviziev
Copy link
Contributor

@vovayatsyuk cool! For now I'm approving this PR, please create static test as a separate PR, I'll try to review it ASAP

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ihor-sviziev, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-8425 has been created to process this Pull Request

@engcom-Alfa
Copy link
Contributor

✔️ QA Passed

Case 1

Create a plugin for : Magento\Backend\ViewModel\ChartDisabled class

Before: ✖️ error occurs

Screenshot from 2020-11-05 13-20-42

After: ✔️ No errors when plugin is called

2020-11-05_14-21

Case 2

Create a plugin for : Magento\Catalog\Model\Config\LayerCategoryConfig class

Before: ✖️ error occurs

Screenshot from 2020-11-05 14-43-46

After: ✔️ No errors when plugin is called

2020-11-05_14-45

Case 3

Create a plugin for : Magento\DownloadableImportExport\Model\Import\Product\Type\Downloadable class

Before: ✖️ error occurs

2020-11-05_15-24

After: ✔️ No errors when plugin is called

Screenshot from 2020-11-05 15-30-53

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Nov 13, 2020

Hi @vovayatsyuk, thank you for your contribution!
Please, complete Contribution Survey, it will take less than a minute.
Your feedback will help us to improve contribution process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Auto-Tests: Not Required Changes in Pull Request does not require coverage by auto-tests Award: bug fix Component: Backend Component: Catalog Component: DownloadableImportExport Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: accept QA: Added to Regression Scope Scenario was analysed and added to Regression Testing Scope Release Line: 2.4 Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Issue] Replace 'static::' with 'self::' when accessing private const.
5 participants