Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generated code is not consistent with Magento requirements and Coding Standard #28351

Conversation

lbajsarowicz
Copy link
Contributor

@lbajsarowicz lbajsarowicz commented May 24, 2020

Description (*)

If you generate Patch using Magento CLI tool and then check it against Coding Standard, several issues are going to be reported.

Related Pull Requests

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

N/A

Manual testing scenarios (*)

N/A

Questions or comments

N/A

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)

Resolved issues:

  1. resolves [Issue] Generated code is not consistent with Magento requirements and Coding Standard #28376: Generated code is not consistent with Magento requirements and Coding Standard

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented May 24, 2020

Hi @lbajsarowicz. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento give me 2.4-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

❗ Automated tests can be triggered manually with an appropriate comment:

  • @magento run all tests - run or re-run all required tests against the PR changes
  • @magento run <test-build(s)> - run or re-run specific test build(s)
    For example: @magento run Unit Tests

<test-build(s)> is a comma-separated list of build names. Allowed build names are:

  1. Database Compare
  2. Functional Tests CE
  3. Functional Tests EE,
  4. Functional Tests B2B
  5. Integration Tests
  6. Magento Health Index
  7. Sample Data Tests CE
  8. Sample Data Tests EE
  9. Sample Data Tests B2B
  10. Static Tests
  11. Unit Tests
  12. WebAPI Tests

You can find more information about the builds here

ℹ️ Please run only needed test builds instead of all when developing. Please run all test builds before sending your PR for review.

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Guide documentation.

@lbajsarowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

Running them all to make sure that there are no side effects.

Copy link
Contributor

@aleron75 aleron75 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I took a look at failing tests and they don't seem related to this PR, so I would approve it.

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @aleron75, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-7588 has been created to process this Pull Request
✳️ @aleron75, could you please add one of the following labels to the Pull Request?

Label Description
Auto-Tests: Covered All changes in Pull Request is covered by auto-tests
Auto-Tests: Not Covered Changes in Pull Request requires coverage by auto-tests
Auto-Tests: Not Required Changes in Pull Request does not require coverage by auto-tests

@engcom-Alfa
Copy link
Contributor

✔️ QA Passed

  1. Run in the console: php bin/magento setup:db-declaration:generate-patch Magento_Catalog test for example;
  2. Open generated file;

Before:
screenshot_22

After:
screenshot_23

@engcom-Charlie engcom-Charlie self-assigned this May 25, 2020
@aleron75 aleron75 added the Auto-Tests: Not Required Changes in Pull Request does not require coverage by auto-tests label May 25, 2020
@engcom-Charlie
Copy link
Contributor

Failed tests not related to changes from this PR.

@engcom-Charlie engcom-Charlie added the QA: Ready to add to Regression Scope Should be analyzed and added to Regression Testing Scope(if applicable) label May 26, 2020
@slavvka
Copy link
Member

slavvka commented May 26, 2020

@magento create issue

@slavvka slavvka added Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround. labels May 27, 2020
@slavvka slavvka added this to the 2.4.1 milestone May 27, 2020
@lbajsarowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

I'd like to verify if there are no issues with current mainline.

@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added QA: Added to Regression Scope Scenario was analysed and added to Regression Testing Scope and removed QA: Ready to add to Regression Scope Should be analyzed and added to Regression Testing Scope(if applicable) labels Jun 16, 2020
magento-engcom-team pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team merged commit 349896c into magento:2.4-develop Jun 24, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 24, 2020

Hi @lbajsarowicz, thank you for your contribution!
Please, complete Contribution Survey, it will take less than a minute.
Your feedback will help us to improve contribution process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Auto-Tests: Not Required Changes in Pull Request does not require coverage by auto-tests Cleanup Component: Developer Partner: Mediotype partners-contribution Pull Request is created by Magento Partner Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Progress: accept QA: Added to Regression Scope Scenario was analysed and added to Regression Testing Scope Release Line: 2.4 Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Issue] Generated code is not consistent with Magento requirements and Coding Standard
6 participants