Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 Performance regression in #238 #248

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #253
Closed

🚨 Performance regression in #238 #248

github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #253

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2024

Regression >= $1.05 found during merge of: #238
Commit: 85c04b3
Triggered by: https://github.com/lurk-lab/arecibo/actions/runs/7455258487

@huitseeker
Copy link
Contributor

huitseeker commented Jan 9, 2024

@samuelburnham The noise threshold of 1.05 is probably a bit low, and within the classic Nova error margin (which is wide). 1.3 seems more reasonable.

Also $1.05, LOL.

@samuelburnham samuelburnham linked a pull request Jan 10, 2024 that will close this issue
huitseeker pushed a commit to huitseeker/arecibo that referenced this issue Jan 14, 2024
* use eq polynomial emulated via power polynomial, to reduce hashing costs

* update version

* add missing file
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant