update benchmarking

[jeremy-daley-kr]

Having followed a @testing-library/dom dependency trail to this update:
A11yance/aria-query#497

...it had me wondering how much of a performance improvement was gained between deep-equal to dequal. This PR just extends/updates current benchmarking to more easily get a conclusion on that... and wow! Looks pretty monumental unless I'm just simply doing something wrong. The load time of deep-equal alone is pretty far up there 😬

Load times:
assert: 0.334ms
util: 0.013ms
deep-equal: 72.528ms
fast-deep-equal: 0.925ms
lodash/isequal: 42.448ms
nano-equal: 0.801ms
dequal: 0.775ms
dequal/lite: 0.4ms

(basic) Validation: 
  ✔ assert.deepStrictEqual
  ✔ util.isDeepStrictEqual
  ✔ deep-equal
  ✔ fast-deep-equal
  ✔ lodash.isEqual
  ✔ nano-equal
  ✔ dequal/lite
  ✔ dequal

(basic) Benchmark: 
  assert.deepStrictEqual x 438,026 ops/sec ±6.23% (89 runs sampled)
  util.isDeepStrictEqual x 473,501 ops/sec ±2.66% (93 runs sampled)
  deep-equal             x 931 ops/sec ±0.70% (92 runs sampled)
  fast-deep-equal        x 1,872,682 ops/sec ±2.43% (91 runs sampled)
  lodash.isEqual         x 497,643 ops/sec ±0.66% (99 runs sampled)
  nano-equal             x 1,340,688 ops/sec ±0.72% (96 runs sampled)
  dequal/lite            x 2,169,654 ops/sec ±1.70% (95 runs sampled)
  dequal                 x 2,177,626 ops/sec ±0.41% (94 runs sampled)

(complex) Validation: 
  ✔ assert.deepStrictEqual
  ✔ util.isDeepStrictEqual
  ✔ deep-equal
  ✔ lodash.isEqual
  ✔ dequal

(complex) Benchmark: 
  assert.deepStrictEqual x 190,108 ops/sec ±1.19% (94 runs sampled)
  util.isDeepStrictEqual x 182,574 ops/sec ±7.89% (96 runs sampled)
  deep-equal             x 344 ops/sec ±1.37% (89 runs sampled)
  lodash.isEqual         x 94,137 ops/sec ±1.42% (94 runs sampled)
  dequal                 x 659,669 ops/sec ±0.80% (99 runs sampled)

[lukeed]

Yes, it's huge & slow. It's the Ever Given of deep equality libs.

Thanks for PR but, all this stuff goes inside bench/package.json, not the root.

[jeremy-daley-kr]

Ah boo. My bad. That would explain a lot. Not sure how I missed that.

[jeremy-daley-kr]

@lukeed Not sure if you're on a case-insensitive volume, but lodash/isequal doesn't work for me without a case update to lodash/isEqual.