Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: Failure in TabTransformer Combiner Unit test #3596

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

jimthompson5802
Copy link
Collaborator

Code Pull Requests

This is a temporary work-around for Issue #3591.

Comment out corner cases that cause failure in tabtransformer combiner unit test.

Root cause appears to be a recent change in PyTorch LayerNorm implementation. See cited issue for details.

Comment out corner cases that cause failure
in tabtransformer combiner unit test.
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2023

Unit Test Results

  6 files  ±       0    6 suites  ±0   1h 12m 31s ⏱️ - 25m 3s
34 tests  - 2 796  29 ✔️  - 2 765    5 💤  - 7  0  - 24 
88 runs   - 2 785  72 ✔️  - 2 756  16 💤  - 5  0  - 24 

Results for commit 0f2e675. ± Comparison against base commit 6f9ed8f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

remove single feature test cases because
layernorm does not apply.
@jimthompson5802
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Based on discussion here pytorch/pytorch#108956, removing all test cases that generate single column batch for the parameter update check test for TabTransformerCombiner.

Copy link
Contributor

@justinxzhao justinxzhao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR fix @jimthompson5802!

@tgaddair tgaddair merged commit 4a72e67 into master Sep 11, 2023
@tgaddair tgaddair deleted the fix-iss3591-tabtransformer-test-failure branch September 11, 2023 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants