-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configuration trouble #3
Comments
Hello, it is a good tip. |
Sure, here you are: `binary_sensor:
So if the problem is the order then I think it is all the more reason to "study" how to create a model where no line must be deleted otherwise it will skip everything ... |
Hi, Can you check, fix and try again? I agree with you that it's not exactly super simple, it can probably be done as you say but from the documentation on how to develop custom ESPHome components I couldn't find a smarter way. |
Ok, checked and you are right (wrong declaration). |
Great idea! Every pull request is welcome! |
Hello @lorenzo-deluca ! |
Hello Lorenzo,
I am a recent and happy user of this integration.
This isn't really an issue.
I'm trying to configure all areas and zones in the most correct and total way but something is not right ...
I noticed that if in the configuration I insert some areas or zones incorrectly in the home assistant "wrong" sensors are created (in a test yesterday, for example, "fuse fault" appeared to me as active but it was not true ...) it would not Is it possible to insert in the readme or in the espkyogate_configuraton.yaml file a configuration model where everything is commented? (currently for example there is only "Zone 1" configured) In this way people would have to do nothing but remove the comments they need to their taste ...
I don't know if I made myself clear ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: