Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ping spec #473
Add ping spec #473
Changes from 3 commits
8383370
8af5686
a263550
bdbb9a1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it "SHOULD" rather than "MUST"?
If the server is allowed to not respond to pings (which is implied by the usage of "SHOULD"), then the protocol is pretty useless.
Of course, the client should be aware of the fact that the server can in practice do something else than this text says, but this is off-topic for a specification. The word "MUST" implicitly means "MUST ... in order to comply to this specification".
The possibility that you might be connected to a peer that doesn't conform to the specification doesn't need to be taken into account in the context of the specification itself, otherwise you've got a snake biting its tail.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So for instance
(or make it global instead of per stream, idk)
200ms of margin to allow for jitter at the networking & scheduler level. This is less elegant than just one request per stream, but what can we do. If your ping suddently goes from 500s to 100ms (for instance if the cpu is clogged up), you will have an erroneous value for one ping.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why? This isn’t DOS mitigation. If you’re worried about rate limiting a 32byte response, then you probably want to do something at a higher level (rate limiting all streams and connections for example).