-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(gossipsub): remove KeepAlive::Until
#4642
feat(gossipsub): remove KeepAlive::Until
#4642
Conversation
Cool! Let us know once this is ready for review. Generally in favor of removing the idle timeout from |
KeepAlive::Until
usage from libp2p-gossipsubKeepAlive::Until
usage from gossipsub
@mxinden I would be deeply grateful for your feedback |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for sending the patch! One small point, otherwise LGTM!
KeepAlive::Until
usage from gossipsubKeepAlive::Until
usage from gossipsub
KeepAlive::Until
usage from gossipsubKeepAlive::Until
usage
KeepAlive::Until
usageKeepAlive::Until
If this PR is okay, I'll move on to the rest protocols. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good, thank you for the contributions! :)
FYI: We set all PRs that are queued for the next breaking change to draft to avoid accidentally merging them. |
Looks good to me, thank you! |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This pull request has merge conflicts. Could you please resolve them @leonzchang? 🙏 |
Approvals have been dismissed because the PR was updated after the send-it
label was applied.
This pull request has merge conflicts. Could you please resolve them @leonzchang? 🙏 |
Description
Related: #3844.
Notes & open questions
Change checklist