-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core/muxing: Replace Into<io::Error>
bound on StreamMuxer
with std::error::Error
#2710
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ed371e1
core/muxing: Remove `Into<io::Error>` bound from `StreamMuxer::Error`
thomaseizinger 8e222b1
Use `?` in `Connection::poll`
thomaseizinger 88ce2f0
Use `?` in `muxing::boxed::Wrap`
thomaseizinger 6cce828
Use `futures::ready!` in `muxing::boxed::Wrap`
thomaseizinger 0dea55f
Fill PR number into changelog
thomaseizinger e017cae
Put `Error + Send + Sync` bounds directly on `StreamMuxer::Error`
thomaseizinger b5da12f
Move `Send + Sync` bounds to higher layers
thomaseizinger 80a35b8
Use `map_inbound_stream` helper
thomaseizinger a28a7c5
Update changelog to match new implementation
thomaseizinger File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not in scope for this PR, but while reviewing I was wondering: Do we even need the
TMuxer
generic onMuxing
? I think the actual type is alwaysStreamMuxerBox
.Muxing
is private the swarm crate and only used byConnection
and there we already use the concreteStreamMuxerBox
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am going to inline the entire
Muxing
type intoConnection
oncepoll_outbound
is removed fromStreamMuxer
. This is already done in #2648 if you want to see what it looks like :)I am also tempted to inline
HandlerWrapper
and centralize all the connection handling logic directly inConnection
. This would remove quite a bit of indirection because substreams would directly be passed from theStreamMuxer
to theConnectionHandler
.