-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Grammar: Preamle vs Constructor #22
Comments
I see there's also an |
We should consider the paper the master right now and bring all the
examples into compliance.
Edward
…On 4/11/19 6:02 AM, goens wrote:
Basically all code examples in the other repo have a |preamble| clause,
that looks very much like the |constructor| class in the paper. Are they
fundamentally different? I would otherwise just replace all instances of
|preamble| with |constructor| in the examples.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIHnNgaN2Y3x6M0Lv_q_u5xzK3LC-Tarks5vfzKAgaJpZM4cpjj2>.
--
Edward A. Lee
Professor of the Graduate School and
Robert S. Pepper Distinguished Professor Emeritus
EECS Department, UC Berkeley
http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/~eal
|
This discussion continues here: lf-lang/lingua-franca#32 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Basically all code examples in the other repo have a
preamble
clause, that looks very much like theconstructor
class in the paper. Are they fundamentally different? I would otherwise just replace all instances ofpreamble
withconstructor
in the examples.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: