Bank to reaction capability is missing

[edwardalee]

Our syntax allows a reaction to be triggered by a contained bank, but this does not currently work, and it it's not entirely clear what it should mean. My proposal is that the reaction is triggered by any output from any of the instances of the bank. This means that the target language needs syntax for getting the width of the bank and iterating over it, something like the following (this does not currently compile):

[cmnrd]

I am currently revising the code C++ code generator to fix #66 and this has also become an issue there. I am taking a similar approach as you suggested (actually I assumed this already works in C). Iterating in C++ is a bit simpler, as the symbol s would be of type std::array<...> and you can use a for each loop.

This gets slightly more complicated if the contained port is also a multiport.

[cmnrd]

#387 implements this for C++. I added two tests ReadMultiportOutputOfContainedBank.lf and ReadOutputOfContainedBank.lf
.