💄 cosmetic generator refactor

[techouse]

I scanned through the generator again and refactored some bits and pieces.

@JEuler let me know your thoughts on this.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9d392a1) 94.02% compared to head (7cb384b) 94.02%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #534   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    94.02%   94.02%           
========================================
  Files           10       10           
  Lines          469      469           
========================================
  Hits           441      441           
  Misses          28       28           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JEuler]

  old: refer('${Vars.client}.${Vars.baseUrl}'),
  new: refer(Vars.client.toString()).property(Vars.baseUrl.toString()),

It becomes longer without any like, typing benefits, I think. Is that necessary after the refactoring?

[techouse]

The intention here is to swap direct String manipulation with something "safer" 😅

[JEuler]

Got it. :)