Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pt] Added words to spelling.txt #11240

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

marcoagpinto
Copy link
Member

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto commented Feb 13, 2025

New words.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Expanded the Portuguese spelling dictionary with 104 new entries, including terms like "absonância," "auto-evidência," and "palavra-passe," enhancing language recognition and processing accuracy for Portuguese content.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated exception handling in language rules by replacing "implantação" with "interação," improving grammatical rule application.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request expands the Portuguese spelling dictionary by adding 104 new entries to the resource file. The update introduces various Portuguese terms—including nouns, adjectives, and culturally specific words—without altering existing content. Additionally, an exception in the language rules configuration is modified to replace "implantação" with "interação," updating the conditions for certain grammatical rules.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
languagetool-language-modules/pt/.../spelling.txt Added 104 new entries to the Portuguese spelling dictionary, covering nouns, adjectives, and terms.
languagetool-language-modules/pt/.../style.xml Updated exception regex in language rules, replacing "implantação" with "interação."

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jaumeortola

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09de5c1 and 197882a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/style.xml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (java-kotlin)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/style.xml (2)

13647-13647: LGTM! The regex pattern is well-formed.

The exception pattern maintains proper syntax and follows the established pattern for verbal nouns ending in "ação".


13647-13647: Verify if this change was intended to be part of this PR.

While the PR description focuses on adding new words to spelling.txt, this change modifies grammar rules by replacing "implantação" with "interação" in the exception list. Please confirm if this modification was intentional.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/spelling.txt (1)

321-321: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify spelling: "autoinflingir" might be incorrect.

The word appears to be a misspelling of "autoinfligir" (from the verb "infligir", meaning "to inflict").


🌐 Web query:

Is the correct spelling "autoinflingir" or "autoinfligir" in Portuguese?

💡 Result:

The correct spelling in Portuguese is "autoinfligir". This form follows the standard rules of Portuguese orthography and etymology:

  1. Etymological basis: The verb derives from Latin infligere (to inflict) combined with the prefix auto-[1][2]. The root -flig- maintains its original spelling without inserting an 'n'[1].

  2. Common error explanation: The incorrect variant "autoinflingir" arises from confusion with:

    • Other Portuguese verbs ending in -ngir (like tingir, cingir)
    • Mispronunciation patterns in some dialects[1][3]
  3. Dictionary confirmation:

    • Priberam Dictionary explicitly lists autoinfligir as the correct form[2]
    • Dicio.com.br states "autoinflingir não existe*" (doesn't exist)[3]

This spelling aligns with official Portuguese language standards maintained by institutions like Academia Brasileira de Letras and Instituto Camões[1][2]. When using this reflexive verb meaning "to inflict on oneself," always use autoinfligir without the 'n'[1][3].


Correct the spelling and consider enhancing verb forms

  • The query confirms that "autoinflingir" is a misspelling. The correct form should be "autoinfligir" per Portuguese orthographic standards.
  • Please update the entry at line 321 in languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/spelling.txt from "autoinflingir" to "autoinfligir".
  • Additionally, since this is a verb, review whether additional conjugated forms should be included for completeness.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/spelling.txt (2)

311-311: Track the temporary solution for dictionary building.

The comment indicates this is a temporary solution. Consider creating an issue to track the proper implementation of dictionary building to ensure this technical debt is addressed.

Would you like me to create an issue to track this improvement?

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~311-~311: Consider using the more polite verb “ask” (“tell” implies ordering/instructing someone).
Context: ...yod # Added by Marco A.G.Pinto. Pedro told me to add here until he fixes the dicti...

(TELL_ASK)


318-321: Consider adding related word forms.

For completeness, consider adding:

  • Conjugated forms of "autoinflingir"
  • Related forms of "arqueologicamente" (e.g., "arqueológico", "arqueológica")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58dd585 and 09de5c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/spelling.txt (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (java-kotlin)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/spelling.txt (1)

312-426: LGTM! Well-structured word additions.

The new words follow consistent patterns with proper:

  • Alphabetical ordering
  • Capitalization for proper nouns
  • Inclusion of plural forms
  • Hyphenation for compound words
  • Gender variations
  • Diminutive forms

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto merged commit 7768e14 into master Feb 13, 2025
5 checks passed
@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto deleted the lt_marcoagpinto_20250213_0924 branch February 13, 2025 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant