-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Neg crd metrics #1222
Neg crd metrics #1222
Conversation
swetharepakula
commented
Aug 20, 2020
•
edited
Loading
edited
- Add metrics to track custom named neg usage
- Add metrics to track internal neg latencies
Hi @swetharepakula. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @freehan |
/cc prameshj |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM overall
I will let pavithra to take a look
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mostly LGTM. Just a few nits
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ func (c *Controller) nodeWorker() { | |||
func (c *Controller) processNode() { | |||
defer func() { | |||
now := c.nodeSyncTracker.Track() | |||
metrics.LastSyncTimestamp.WithLabelValues().Set(float64(now.UTC().UnixNano())) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed the metric from a GaugeVec to a Gauge, so there are no more labels needed.
pkg/neg/metrics/metrics.go
Outdated
|
||
syncerMetricsLabels = []string{ | ||
"neg_type", //type of neg | ||
"endpoint_calulator", // type of endpoint calculator used |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: call this "endpoint_calculator_mode"?
pkg/neg/metrics/metrics.go
Outdated
Namespace: metrics.GLBC_NAMESPACE, | ||
Subsystem: negControllerSubsystem, | ||
Name: negOpLatencyKey, | ||
Help: "Latency of a NEG syncer for Endpoint Operation", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Latency of NEG operation"?
pkg/neg/metrics/metrics.go
Outdated
Namespace: metrics.GLBC_NAMESPACE, | ||
Subsystem: negControllerSubsystem, | ||
Name: negOpEndpointsKey, | ||
Help: "Number of Endpoints during an Endpoint Operation", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NEG operation?
pkg/neg/syncers/transaction.go
Outdated
@@ -293,11 +298,13 @@ func (s *transactionSyncer) syncNetworkEndpoints(addEndpoints, removeEndpoints m | |||
return nil | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if err := syncFunc(addEndpoints, attachOp); err != nil { | |||
err := syncFunc(addEndpoints, attachOp) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: is this change needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No this change isn't needed, I think it is a remanent of an earlier version of the code.
pkg/neg/metrics/metrics.go
Outdated
}) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func ObserveNegOperation(operation, negType, apiVersion string, err error, numEndpoints int, start time.Time) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Can we call this "PublishNegOperationMetrics" and similar for the other functions here? That will make it very clear when reading the code this is called at.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like that suggestion, updating all the publishing functions.
7842473
to
5a0145e
Compare
/lgtm |
5a0145e
to
208a865
Compare
208a865
to
b73e95a
Compare
- remove `glbc` namespace to existing ingress metrics - change last sync timestamp metric to gauge
b73e95a
to
aba3c6e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: freehan, swetharepakula The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Cherry Pick #1222 [Neg crd metrics]