Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Neg crd metrics #1222

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 24, 2020
Merged

Conversation

swetharepakula
Copy link
Member

@swetharepakula swetharepakula commented Aug 20, 2020

  • Add metrics to track custom named neg usage
  • Add metrics to track internal neg latencies

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @swetharepakula. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 20, 2020
@swetharepakula
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @freehan

@swetharepakula
Copy link
Member Author

/cc prameshj

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from prameshj August 20, 2020 19:39
@freehan
Copy link
Contributor

freehan commented Aug 21, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 21, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@freehan freehan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall

I will let pavithra to take a look

Copy link
Contributor

@prameshj prameshj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mostly LGTM. Just a few nits

@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ func (c *Controller) nodeWorker() {
func (c *Controller) processNode() {
defer func() {
now := c.nodeSyncTracker.Track()
metrics.LastSyncTimestamp.WithLabelValues().Set(float64(now.UTC().UnixNano()))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed the metric from a GaugeVec to a Gauge, so there are no more labels needed.


syncerMetricsLabels = []string{
"neg_type", //type of neg
"endpoint_calulator", // type of endpoint calculator used
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: call this "endpoint_calculator_mode"?

Namespace: metrics.GLBC_NAMESPACE,
Subsystem: negControllerSubsystem,
Name: negOpLatencyKey,
Help: "Latency of a NEG syncer for Endpoint Operation",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Latency of NEG operation"?

Namespace: metrics.GLBC_NAMESPACE,
Subsystem: negControllerSubsystem,
Name: negOpEndpointsKey,
Help: "Number of Endpoints during an Endpoint Operation",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NEG operation?

@@ -293,11 +298,13 @@ func (s *transactionSyncer) syncNetworkEndpoints(addEndpoints, removeEndpoints m
return nil
}

if err := syncFunc(addEndpoints, attachOp); err != nil {
err := syncFunc(addEndpoints, attachOp)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: is this change needed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No this change isn't needed, I think it is a remanent of an earlier version of the code.

})
}

func ObserveNegOperation(operation, negType, apiVersion string, err error, numEndpoints int, start time.Time) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Can we call this "PublishNegOperationMetrics" and similar for the other functions here? That will make it very clear when reading the code this is called at.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like that suggestion, updating all the publishing functions.

@freehan
Copy link
Contributor

freehan commented Aug 24, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 24, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 24, 2020
 - remove `glbc` namespace to existing ingress metrics
 - change last sync timestamp metric to gauge
Copy link
Contributor

@freehan freehan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 24, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: freehan, swetharepakula

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 18d503b into kubernetes:master Aug 24, 2020
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2020
@swetharepakula swetharepakula deleted the neg-crd-metrics branch September 18, 2020 00:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants