Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doks: use providerID for node.ID #2427

Merged

Conversation

snormore
Copy link

@snormore snormore commented Oct 6, 2019

Problem

The cluster-autoscaler uses node.Spec.ProviderID to determine which nodes are unregistered, so that they can be eventually deleted in an attempt to replace by registered instances. The node.Id that we assign in cluster-autoscaler is the DOKS node UUID, so the nodes always look unregistered to the autoscaler, because they're using different IDs. This results in nodes flapping in and out of not ready as they're deleted via k8s by the cluster-autoscaler.

Solution

Derive the cluster-autoscaler node.Id from the node droplet ID and in the providerID form that it expects (i.e. digitalocean://12345678), instead of the DOKS node UUID.

This also upgrades the vendored godo package.

cc @timoreimann @andrewsykim

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 6, 2019
@snormore
Copy link
Author

snormore commented Oct 6, 2019

/assign @andrewsykim

Copy link
Contributor

@timoreimann timoreimann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two optional suggestions from my end, but otherwise LGTM (though I don't have approval powers).

@snormore snormore force-pushed the doks-use-node-provider-id branch from ecc52d5 to 4d6752f Compare October 7, 2019 11:59
@snormore snormore force-pushed the doks-use-node-provider-id branch from 4d6752f to 37aa3f8 Compare October 21, 2019 16:47
@snormore snormore force-pushed the doks-use-node-provider-id branch from 37aa3f8 to 7e69503 Compare October 21, 2019 16:48
@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewsykim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 21, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b80a9f6 into kubernetes:master Oct 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants