-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add BASE_IMAGE_FULL build arg #78
Add BASE_IMAGE_FULL build arg #78
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez <carangog@redhat.com>
use a more upstream base image for second stage `debian:buster-slim` leaving it open for change via build arg and Makefile var BASE_IMAGE_FULL Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez <carangog@redhat.com>
/assign marquiz |
Looks basically good. Just pondering the naming of the variable, are you planning to have a |
Ready for second pass :) |
/joke |
/test all |
/joke |
@ArangoGutierrez: The first time I got a universal remote control I thought to myself, "This changes everything" In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@ArangoGutierrez: How many hipsters does it take to change a lightbulb? Oh, it's a really obscure number. You've probably never heard of it. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
nit: the title of this PR is misleading. I'd change it to something like Add BASE_IMAGE_FULL build arg |
/retitle Add BASE_IMAGE_FULL build arg |
642bf6a
to
de207a8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we'd better add the minimal image in a separate PR.
Need to add CI support (build-image and push-image) plus preferably mention that in the documentation, too.
Talking about CI, should we have an images
Makefile target building both images and use that in scripts/test-infra/build-image.sh
🤔
de207a8
to
dbb6b07
Compare
OK, removed the commit, will turn that one into a PR, + documentation + CI (in a single PR) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, now
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ArangoGutierrez, marquiz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Follow up PR #82 |
This patch :