Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable TopologyUpdater worker #116

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022

Conversation

ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez carangog@redhat.com

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 8, 2022
@ArangoGutierrez ArangoGutierrez force-pushed the devel/v0.4 branch 2 times, most recently from 78250a7 to 38fdfb1 Compare February 8, 2022 21:46
Copy link
Contributor

@marquiz marquiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work @ArangoGutierrez 👍 Just had a few comments and questions.

One bigger question/note: should(n't) we also status/conditions for topologyupdater?

api/v1/nodefeaturediscovery_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/v1/nodefeaturediscovery_types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
build/assets/topologyupdater/01_sa.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
build/assets/topologyupdater/05_Daemonset.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/nodefeaturediscovery_controls.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez <carangog@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@intel.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@marquiz marquiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ArangoGutierrez. I think this is good to go 👍
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ArangoGutierrez, marquiz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [ArangoGutierrez,marquiz]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit efab127 into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 9, 2022
@ArangoGutierrez ArangoGutierrez added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Feb 9, 2022
This was referenced Feb 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants