-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename VPC security group types #1783
Rename VPC security group types #1783
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-ibmcloud ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
// id of the Security Group. | ||
// +optional | ||
ID *string `json:"id,omitempty"` | ||
|
||
// name of the Security Group. | ||
// +optional | ||
Name *string `json:"name,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dharaneeshvrd, is this by mistake? you intended to delete VPC and ResouceGroup right
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, corrected, thanks @Amulyam24 !
7815402
to
e714b4f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Please fill in the release note.
api/v1beta2/types.go
Outdated
|
||
const ( | ||
// SecurityGroupRuleActionAllow defines that the Rule should allow traffic. | ||
SecurityGroupRuleActionAllow SecurityGroupRuleAction = vpcv1.NetworkACLRuleActionAllowConst | ||
SecurityGroupRuleActionAllow VPCSecurityGroupRuleAction = vpcv1.NetworkACLRuleActionAllowConst |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you wanna rename the variable names as well to keep them also in the same format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes renamed all of them, thanks!
e714b4f
to
8e1b2c2
Compare
Remove VPC and resource group field from VPC security group since it is causing confusion by providing an option to pass a different resource than the one used in cluster
8e1b2c2
to
5133465
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Amulyam24, dharaneeshvrd, mkumatag The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Remove VPC and resource group field from VPC security group since it is causing by providing an option to pass a different resource than the one used in cluster
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #1770
Special notes for your reviewer:
/area provider/ibmcloud
Release note: