Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: remove grpc wrapper #1634

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

MartinForReal
Copy link
Contributor

@MartinForReal MartinForReal commented Dec 21, 2023

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
Refactor: remove grpc wrapper
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Requirements:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 21, 2023
@MartinForReal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@MartinForReal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

s.Start(endpoint, d, d, d, testBool)
s.Wait()
//setup grpc server
opts := []grpc.ServerOption{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's the intention for this?
why not wrap NewNonBlockingGRPCServer to make logic more clear?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the wrapper is not shared among csi projects.
It is only referred by main once.
The wrapper doesn't introduce any extra function which grpc server provides.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@MartinForReal MartinForReal Dec 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, we don't need to inject any code to prod code for test purposes. the metrics related code can be put to one place. mock objects can be injected via constructor which simplify the ut implementation.
and the line of code decreased.
I think this will make the code clearer.

Copy link
Member

@andyzhangx andyzhangx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 22, 2023
@andyzhangx andyzhangx merged commit 0406086 into kubernetes-sigs:master Dec 22, 2023
10 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, MartinForReal

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 22, 2023
@MartinForReal MartinForReal deleted the shafan/grpc branch December 22, 2023 11:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants