Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distributed health monitor controller #87

Closed
xing-yang opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

Distributed health monitor controller #87

xing-yang opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

For local storage (e.g. LVM disks) it makes sense to support a deployment model where the driver only runs locally on nodes together with sidecars. This is already support for provisioning (kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner#524, https://github.com/kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner#deployment-on-each-node).

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor Author

In the health monitor controller, the sidecar probably needs to check whether the volume is local before invoking the CSI driver. This can be achieved via the existing topology field. kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner#592 might help to reduce traffic by configuring the informer so that it filters by label and thus only receives PVs that are of interest. See kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner#583 for code which does such server-side filtering for CSIStorageCapacity objects.

@xing-yang xing-yang changed the title Distributed volume health controller Distributed health monitor controller Aug 12, 2021
@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xinyanw409 can you assign this issue to yourself?

@xinyanw409
Copy link

/assign

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here's an example implementation in external-snapshotter: kubernetes-csi/external-snapshotter#585

fengzixu pushed a commit to fengzixu/external-health-monitor that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2021
a0f195c Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#106 from msau42/fix-canary
7100c12 Only set staging registry when running canary job
b3c65f9 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#99 from msau42/add-release-process
e53f3e8 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#103 from msau42/fix-canary
d129462 Document new method for adding CI jobs are new K8s versions
e73c2ce Use staging registry for canary tests
2c09846 Add cleanup instructions to release-notes generation
60e1cd3 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#98 from pohly/kubernetes-1-19-fixes
0979c09 prow.sh: fix E2E suite for Kubernetes >= 1.18
3b4a2f1 prow.sh: fix installing Go for Kubernetes 1.19.0
1fbb636 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#97 from pohly/go-1.15
82d108a switch to Go 1.15
d8a2530 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#95 from msau42/add-release-process
843bddc Add steps on promoting release images
0345a83 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#94 from linux-on-ibm-z/bump-timeout
1fdf2d5 cloud build: bump timeout in Prow job
41ec6d1 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#93 from animeshk08/patch-1
5a54e67 filter-junit: Fix gofmt error
0676fcb Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#92 from animeshk08/patch-1
36ea4ff filter-junit: Fix golint error
f5a4203 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#91 from cyb70289/arm64
43e50d6 prow.sh: enable building arm64 image
0d5bd84 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#90 from pohly/k8s-staging-sig-storage
3df86b7 cloud build: k8s-staging-sig-storage
c5fd961 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#89 from pohly/cloud-build-binfmt
db0c2a7 cloud build: initialize support for running commands in Dockerfile
be902f4 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#88 from pohly/multiarch-windows-fix
340e082 build.make: optional inclusion of Windows in multiarch images
5231f05 build.make: properly declare push-multiarch
4569f27 build.make: fix push-multiarch ambiguity
17dde9e Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#87 from pohly/cloud-build
bd41690 cloud build: initial set of shared files
9084fec Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#81 from msau42/add-release-process
6f2322e Update patch release notes generation command
0fcc3b1 Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#78 from ggriffiths/fix_csi_snapshotter_rbac_version_set
d8c76fe Support local snapshot RBAC for pull jobs
c1bdf5b Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#80 from msau42/add-release-process
ea1f94a update release tools instructions
152396e Merge pull request kubernetes-csi#77 from ggriffiths/snapshotter201_update
7edc146 Update snapshotter to version 2.0.1

git-subtree-dir: release-tools
git-subtree-split: a0f195cc2ddc2a1f07d4d3e46fc08187db358f94
awels added a commit to awels/hostpath-provisioner-operator that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2021
The csi external health monitor does not yet support distributed
health monitor controller kubernetes-csi/external-health-monitor#87
So there is no reason to deploy it for the hpp at this point.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Wels <awels@redhat.com>
kubevirt-bot pushed a commit to kubevirt/hostpath-provisioner-operator that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2021
The csi external health monitor does not yet support distributed
health monitor controller kubernetes-csi/external-health-monitor#87
So there is no reason to deploy it for the hpp at this point.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Wels <awels@redhat.com>
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 22, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 21, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mowangdk
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants