-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates frontend to Typescript to 3.3.1 #772
Updates frontend to Typescript to 3.3.1 #772
Conversation
7722634
to
280831c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this is much cleaner!
afterEach(async () => { | ||
// unmount() should be called before resetAllMocks() in case any part of the unmount life cycle | ||
// depends on mocks/spies | ||
if (tree) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You don't need the check. I don't think anything happens if the tree is unmounted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the await
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like the await
probably isn't needed. We do it in many other tests though. I'll go through and clean that up
280831c
to
f80b719
Compare
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/test kubeflow-pipeline-sample-test |
15ba7ab
to
627f7c0
Compare
…mRenderer to make better use of FunctionComponent typings
627f7c0
to
b00f0b5
Compare
/test kubeflow-pipeline-sample-test |
/test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test |
@rileyjbauer: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: yebrahim The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Also updates code around
CustomTable customRenderer
to make better use ofFunctionComponent
typings.This change is