Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK/Components - Added naming.generate_unique_name_conversion_table #716

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Jan 21, 2019

Extracting the function to reduce the amount of boilerplate code.
The generate_unique_name_conversion_table function replaces _make_name_unique_by_adding_index and simplifies code in several places.

/assign @qimingj @gaoning777 @hongye-sun


This change is Reviewable

@Ark-kun Ark-kun force-pushed the SDK/Components---Added-naming.generate_unique_name_conversion_table branch from 7ed2c63 to 5740055 Compare January 25, 2019 06:34
generate_unique_name_conversion_table replaces _make_name_unique_by_adding_index and simplifies code in several places.
@Ark-kun Ark-kun force-pushed the SDK/Components---Added-naming.generate_unique_name_conversion_table branch from 5740055 to 5964401 Compare January 25, 2019 06:42
@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Feb 1, 2019

/retest

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Feb 1, 2019

/cc @gaoning777 @hongye-sun Gentle ping.

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Feb 2, 2019

@gaoning777 Would you kindly look at this small refactoring PR.

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Feb 2, 2019

@hongye-sun Maybe you can help?

@hongye-sun
Copy link
Contributor

Other than missing the test, the PR lgtm overall.

Copy link
Contributor

@hongye-sun hongye-sun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Mar 6, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit fa02e75 into kubeflow:master Mar 6, 2019
@Ark-kun Ark-kun deleted the SDK/Components---Added-naming.generate_unique_name_conversion_table branch March 7, 2019 21:32
cheyang pushed a commit to alibaba/pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2019
…ubeflow#716)

generate_unique_name_conversion_table replaces _make_name_unique_by_adding_index and simplifies code in several places.
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
* We need to upload the junits to the artifacts/junit_* directory

Related to GoogleCloudPlatform/kubeflow-distribution#65
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
Endpoint in kfserver changed to include v1. Updated example to reflect the api change.
HumairAK pushed a commit to red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
* Exclude files/folders that should not get rebased
* Add paragraph on finding undesired code changes
* Add reference to previous rebase PRs for guidance

Signed-off-by: Christian Kadner <ckadner@us.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants