Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let RemotePayloadProcessor send also gRPC call Metadata #96

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 26, 2023
Merged

Let RemotePayloadProcessor send also gRPC call Metadata #96

merged 11 commits into from
May 26, 2023

Conversation

tteofili
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

The RemotePayloadProcessor currently doesn't send gRPC call Metadata as part of its PayloadContent (to a remote endpoint).
Such information might be important for many reasons, including debugging purposes.

Modifications

RemotePayloadProcessor's PayloadContent now also features a Map that contains such Metadata information (when available).

Result

RemotePayloadProcessor sends also Metadata information (to a remote endpoint).

@kserve-oss-bot kserve-oss-bot requested review from njhill and rafvasq May 16, 2023 11:03
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Teofili <tteofili@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @tteofili this looks great, and apologies for the delay in looking at it.

tteofili and others added 2 commits May 26, 2023 16:27
…ocessor.java

Co-authored-by: Nick Hill <nickhill@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommaso Teofili <tteofili@redhat.com>
@tteofili tteofili self-assigned this May 26, 2023
Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @tteofili LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@ckadner ckadner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kserve-oss-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ckadner, njhill, tteofili

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kserve-oss-bot kserve-oss-bot merged commit cef2b97 into kserve:main May 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved enhancement New feature or request lgtm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants