fix: Updated dependencies to resolve security vulnerabilities

[upendrao]

---

Description

Related to #1045

Updated following dependencies to resolve security vulnerabilities

• com.graphql-java:graphql-java
• com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind
  Updated unit tests to be able to parse test schemas with more tokens than the default size(15000)

---

Changes were made to:

• Codegen library - Java
• Codegen library - Kotlin
• Codegen library - Scala
• Maven plugin
• Gradle plugin
• SBT plugin
• Dependencies

[kobylynskyi]

Thanks @upendrao for the contribution!

[kobylynskyi]

@upendrao I've merged your PR and for some reason build in develop branch is now failing: https://github.com/kobylynskyi/graphql-java-codegen/actions/runs/4436709200/jobs/7785474765

[upendrao]

@kobylynskyi I'm looking at the failure and shall submit a PR on that.

[upendrao]

Hi @kobylynskyi ! Can I ask you a question here?
I have bunch of graphql schemas from DataHub on top of which I want to write my own custom queries as we run from a GraphQL end point. How can I use this plugin to generate code for custom queries.
For example I tried to add an additional graphql file in the schemas folder for the plugin but could not see any code generated for my custom query. Any leads?

[kobylynskyi]

hey @upendrao
few questions:
1 - There's one folder with all the schemas and you created another file with your own queries?
2 - Does your schema file have an extend keyword? If you have queries spread across multiple files you would want to have extend type Query { ... } in every file.
3 - If the answer to questions 1 and 2 is yes, but you still don't see a code generated for your custom schema, then try keeping only your schemas in the folder (deleting all other) and see if classes are generated. You can investigate from there.
Let me know how it goes.

[upendrao]

Hi, If I use 'extend type Query {' then I think I need to implement that query on my own as it wont exist on GraphQL server. For example I have a query as follows then I want to generate Java/Kotlin code for that query so that I can easily deserialize the response into it. query { listDomains( input: {} ) { start count total domains { urn properties { name } } } } The types defined in the base schema (ex: Domain here) have a mix of nullable and non-nullable fields. But in a query projection we (want to)list only a subset of the fields of a specific type. I am experiencing a challenge while deserializing such types when the projection does not include a non-nullable field. Is there any fix for this on the json codec? Best Regards, Upendra

…

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 3:30 PM Bogdan Kobylynskyi ***@***.***> wrote: hey @upendrao <https://github.com/upendrao> few questions: 1 - There's one folder with all the schemas and you created another file with your own queries? 2 - Does your schema file have an extend keyword? If you have queries spread across multiple files you would want to have extend type Query { ... } in every file. 3 - If the answer to questions 1 and 2 is *yes*, but you still don't see a code generated for your custom schema, then try keeping only your schemas in the folder (deleting all other) and see if classes are generated. You can investigate from there. Let me know how it goes. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1046 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA7BMZXCURMXBVX7LNWOWIDW63L7FANCNFSM6AAAAAAV5CYIEQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>