Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.2] bump ggcr which includes auth config lookup fixes for k8s #12656

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2022

Conversation

dprotaso
Copy link
Member

Part of #12642

Includes the fixes:

Release Note

Fix tag to digest resolution when the registry credential is in a K8s secret

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 23, 2022
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dprotaso

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 23, 2022
@dprotaso dprotaso changed the title bump ggcr which includes auth config lookup fixes for k8s [release-1.2] bump ggcr which includes auth config lookup fixes for k8s Feb 23, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release-1.2@1d9c0f2). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             release-1.2   #12656   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   87.42%           
==============================================
  Files                  ?      195           
  Lines                  ?     9712           
  Branches               ?        0           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?     8491           
  Misses                 ?      934           
  Partials               ?      287           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1d9c0f2...8c08c7f. Read the comment docs.

@dprotaso
Copy link
Member Author

blocked on #12657

@dprotaso
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

3 similar comments
@dprotaso
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@dprotaso
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@dprotaso
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@nader-ziada
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 25, 2022
@dprotaso
Copy link
Member Author

Known issue - a new 1.1 point release is coming out and after this lands I'll land a fix in the 1.2 branch

/override pull-knative-serving-upgrade-tests

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dprotaso: Overrode contexts on behalf of dprotaso: pull-knative-serving-upgrade-tests

In response to this:

Known issue - a new 1.1 point release is coming out and after this lands I'll land a fix in the 1.2 branch

/override pull-knative-serving-upgrade-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dprotaso
Copy link
Member Author

/override pull-knative-serving-istio-latest-no-mesh

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dprotaso: Overrode contexts on behalf of dprotaso: pull-knative-serving-istio-latest-no-mesh

In response to this:

/override pull-knative-serving-istio-latest-no-mesh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit a62fbd5 into knative:release-1.2 Feb 25, 2022
@dprotaso dprotaso deleted the release-1.2 branch February 25, 2022 21:00
openshift-merge-robot pushed a commit to openshift/knative-serving that referenced this pull request May 26, 2022
* Pin to 1.23 S-O branch

* Add 0-kourier.yaml and 1-config-network.yaml to kourier.yaml (#1122)

* Rename kourier.yaml with 0-kourier.yaml

* Concat the files

* fix csv logic (#1125)

* Reduce the period and failure threshold for activator readiness (knative#12618)

The default drain timeout is 45 seconds which was much shorter than
the time it takes the activator to be recognized as not ready (2 minutes)

This was resulting in 503s since the activator was receiving traffic when it
was not expecting it

Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>

* Address 503s when the autoscaler is being rolled (knative#12621)

The activator's readiness depends on the status of web socket connection
to the autoscaler. When the connection is down the activator will report
ready=false. This can occur when the autoscaler deployment is updating.

PR knative#12614 made the activator's readiness probe fail aggressively after
a single failure. This didn't seem to impact istio but with contour it
started returning 503s since the activator started to report ready=false
immediately.

This PR does two things to mitigate 503s:
- bump the readiness threshold to give the autoscaler more time to
  rollout/startup. This still remains lower than the drain duration
- Update the autoscaler rollout strategy so we spin up a new instance
  prior to bring down the older one. This is done using maxUnavailable=0

Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>

* [release-1.2] Drop MaxDurationSeconds from the RevisionSpec  (knative#12640)

* Drop MaxDurationSeconds from the RevisionSpec (knative#12635)

We added MaxDurationSeconds (knative#12322) because the behaviour of
RevisionSpec.Timeout changed from total duration to time to first byte.

In hindsight changing the behaviour of Timeout was a mistake since
it goes against the original specification.

Thus we're going to create a path for migration and the first part is
to remove MaxDurationSeconds from the RevisionSpec.

* fix conformance test

* [release-1.2] fix ytt package name (knative#12657)

* fix ytt package name

* use correct path

Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>

* Remove an unnecessary start delay when resolving tag to digests (knative#12669)

Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>

* Drop collecting performance data in release branch (knative#12673)

Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>

* bump ggcr which includes auth config lookup fixes for k8s (knative#12656)

Includes the fixes:
- google/go-containerregistry#1299
- google/go-containerregistry#1300

* Fixes an activator panic when the throttle encounters a cache.DeleteFinalStateUnknown (knative#12680)

Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>

* upgrade to latest dependencies (knative#12674)

bumping knative.dev/pkg 77555ea...083dd97:
  > 083dd97 Wait for reconciler/controllers to return prior to exiting the process (# 2438)
  > df430fa dizzy: we must use `flags` instead of `pflags`, since this is not working. It seems like pflag.* adds the var to its own flag set, not the one package flag uses, and it doesn't expose the internal flag.Var externally - hence this fix. (# 2415)

Signed-off-by: Knative Automation <automation@knative.team>

* [release-1.2] fix tag to digest resolution (ggcr bump) (knative#12834)

* pin k8s dep

* Fix tag to digest resolution with K8s secrets

I forgot to bump ggcr's sub package in the prior release

github.com/google/go-containerregistry/pkg/authn/k8schain

* bump ggcr which fixes tag-to-digest resolution for Azure & GitLab (knative#12857)

Co-authored-by: Stavros Kontopoulos <st.kontopoulos@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Knative Prow Robot <knative-prow-robot@google.com>
Co-authored-by: dprotaso <dprotaso@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: knative-automation <automation@knative.team>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants