minor tweaks to wording/clarifications #484
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danini-the-panini
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2025
tabatkins
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2025
|
Looks good, but you also have to move these edits over to the RFC version of the spec now. ^_^ |
|
yeah T_T |
35c929a to
53b7bf8
Compare
53b7bf8 to
c2409b9
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
these are just a few minor wording tweaks and a test I thought might be useful, since it occurred to me that we can do stuff like spread a big base64 binary across several lines using
\.I also snuck in
Ascii85because that seems handy to mention, but I'm happy to take it out if that's controversial.