Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor ParseError class to extend SyntaxError #255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kamiazya
Copy link
Owner

@kamiazya kamiazya commented Jun 11, 2024

This pull request refactors the ParseError class to extend the SyntaxError class. This change ensures that the ParseError class is an instance of SyntaxError, as required by the specification. It also updates the documentation to reflect this change.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling by updating ParseError to extend SyntaxError.
  • Tests

    • Added test cases for InvalidOptionError and ParseError classes to ensure proper functionality and inheritance.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 11, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 17f8684

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve updating the ParseError class to extend SyntaxError instead of Error for better semantic alignment. Additionally, test cases were added for both InvalidOptionError and ParseError classes to ensure their correct behavior and inheritance properties.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/common/errors.ts ParseError now extends SyntaxError instead of Error. Added comments for clarification.
src/common/errors.spec.ts Introduced new test cases for InvalidOptionError and ParseError classes.

Poem

In the code, a change so bright,
ParseError now takes flight,
From SyntaxError it does spring,
Clearer meanings it will bring.
Tests were added, all in line,
Ensuring all behaves just fine.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kamiazya kamiazya self-assigned this Jun 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.52%. Comparing base (88fbef6) to head (17f8684).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #255   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.52%   99.52%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines         419      419           
  Branches       98       98           
=======================================
  Hits          417      417           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jun 11, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #255 will degrade performances by 85.33%

Comparing fix-parse-error-base (17f8684) with main (88fbef6)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
❌ 1 (👁 1) regressions
✅ 5 untouched benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark main fix-parse-error-base Change
parseString.toIterableIterator(50 rows) 1,117 µs 613.8 µs +81.97%
👁 parseStringToArraySyncWASM(50 rows) 936.6 µs 6,386.6 µs -85.33%

@kamiazya kamiazya changed the title "Refactor ParseError class to extend SyntaxError" Refactor ParseError class to extend SyntaxError Jun 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88fbef6 and 17f8684.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .changeset/plenty-guests-give.md (1 hunks)
  • src/common/errors.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/common/errors.ts (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
  • .changeset/plenty-guests-give.md: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
Additional comments not posted (5)
.changeset/plenty-guests-give.md (1)

1-5: Changeset description is clear and accurately reflects the PR changes.

src/common/errors.ts (2)

25-31: The updated comments clearly explain the relationship between ParseError and SyntaxError, aligning with the specification.


33-33: Refactoring ParseError to extend SyntaxError is correctly implemented.

src/common/errors.spec.ts (2)

4-36: The tests for InvalidOptionError are comprehensive, covering its properties and instance checks.


39-88: The tests for ParseError are thorough, correctly verifying its properties, inheritance, and specific behavior.

@kamiazya kamiazya merged commit 49af679 into main Jun 11, 2024
22 checks passed
@kamiazya kamiazya deleted the fix-parse-error-base branch June 11, 2024 12:37
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant