Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update benchmark iterations #182

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024
Merged

Update benchmark iterations #182

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

kamiazya
Copy link
Owner

@kamiazya kamiazya commented Mar 27, 2024

The stability of the benchmark test is unstable, so the number of iterations is increased by a factor of 5 to see what happens.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated the benchmark iterations in the web CSV toolbox for enhanced performance testing.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 27, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 812aabf

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces a significant enhancement to the web-csv-toolbox, focusing on improving benchmarking processes. By adjusting the benchmark iterations for more accurate performance testing, this patch aims to refine the tool's efficiency and reliability. This change is pivotal for users seeking precise benchmark results, ensuring the web-csv-toolbox remains a top choice for handling CSV-related tasks.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.changeset/...-help.md Introduced an update to the web-csv-toolbox focusing on benchmark iterations.
benchmark/main.ts Modified Bench instance initialization to include an iterations parameter of 50.

🐰✨
A hop, a skip, in the code we dip,
To tweak and tune, under the moon.
Fifty rounds we'll run, not for fun,
But for the speed, to fulfill the need.
With every patch, perfection we snatch,
In the toolbox we trust, improve we must!
🌟🛠

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@kamiazya kamiazya self-assigned this Mar 27, 2024
@kamiazya kamiazya added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.19%. Comparing base (4fcf2b2) to head (812aabf).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #182   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.19%   99.19%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines         372      372           
  Branches      111      111           
=======================================
  Hits          369      369           
  Misses          3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4fcf2b2 and 812aabf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/strong-colts-help.md (1 hunks)
  • benchmark/main.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
.changeset/strong-colts-help.md (1)
  • 1-5: The changeset description provides a concise update on the benchmark iterations for web-csv-toolbox. However, it could benefit from additional details regarding the nature of the update (e.g., why the iterations were updated, the expected impact on benchmarking results, etc.). This would enhance clarity and provide more context for the change.
benchmark/main.ts (2)
  • 29-31: The addition of the iterations parameter with a value of 50 to the Bench instance initialization is a clear and direct way to specify the number of iterations for benchmarking. Ensure that the chosen number of iterations aligns with the benchmarking goals and is appropriate for obtaining reliable and meaningful results.
  • 26-34: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [29-57]

Ensure that the benchmarking library (tinybench) and its plugin (@codspeed/tinybench-plugin) are correctly handling async operations in the benchmarking setup. This is crucial for obtaining accurate and reliable benchmarking results, especially for the async test cases included in the setup.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 27, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #182 will degrade performances by 37.43%

Comparing fix-benchmark-iteration (812aabf) with main (4fcf2b2)

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 6 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark main fix-benchmark-iteration Change
parseString.toStream(large-dataset) 1.9 s 3 s -37.43%

@kamiazya kamiazya merged commit cb649b3 into main Mar 27, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
@kamiazya kamiazya deleted the fix-benchmark-iteration branch March 27, 2024 13:37
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant