Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor Lexer class and update documentation #175

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kamiazya
Copy link
Owner

@kamiazya kamiazya commented Mar 23, 2024

This pull request refactors the Lexer class to improve its internal operation and updates the documentation accordingly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the performance of the Lexer in the "web-csv-toolbox".
    • Enhanced Lexer functionality for better tokenization and extraction of CSV data.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 23, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: b68699f

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the web-csv-toolbox focus on enhancing the Lexer's performance and functionality. Key improvements include a refactored Lexer that now supports buffering, advanced tokenization, and the ability to handle various CSV data intricacies more efficiently.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/Lexer.ts Added buffering, new methods for tokenization, and enhanced CSV data extraction capabilities.
.changeset/...-clean.md,
.changeset/...-turn.md
Patches and improvements for Lexer performance and internal operations in web-csv-toolbox.

Possibly related issues

  • Issue Fix Lexer Parsing Issue with Non-Standard Delimiters and Quotations #63: This issue addresses the need for improved parsing of non-standard CSV formats, which seems to be targeted by the new Lexer functionalities introduced in src/Lexer.ts. The enhancements in tokenization and handling of quoted strings could potentially resolve the parsing issues mentioned.

🐇✨ A whimsical ode to code, by a rabbit bold and bright,
In the toolbox of the web, where CSVs alight,
Lexer leaps and bounds ahead, with tokens clean and tight,
Parsing through the commas, from morning until night,
Cheers to devs, with every commit, the future's looking bright! 🌟🎉


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e651c9c and b68699f.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .changeset/strange-shirts-clean.md (1 hunks)
  • .changeset/thirty-donkeys-turn.md (1 hunks)
  • src/Lexer.ts (5 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • src/Lexer.ts (no review received)
Additional Context Used
Learnings (1)
src/Lexer.ts (1)
User: kamiazya
PR: kamiazya/web-csv-toolbox#29
File: src/transformers/LexerTransformer.ts:146-150
Timestamp: 2024-01-04T16:00:17.243Z
Learning: The documentation within the `LexerTransformer` class was corrected to accurately describe the behavior of the `#nextToken` method when not flushing and the buffer does not end with a quotation mark, as per commit `d5c7acd6cd074296ab8dd39c62acb3efd84d4707`.
Additional comments not posted (2)
.changeset/thirty-donkeys-turn.md (1)

5-5: The changeset description clearly outlines the improvements made to the Lexer's internal operation.

.changeset/strange-shirts-clean.md (1)

5-5: The changeset description clearly outlines the performance improvements made to the Lexer.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.18%. Comparing base (e651c9c) to head (b68699f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #175      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.19%   99.18%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines         372      370       -2     
  Branches      111      111              
==========================================
- Hits          369      367       -2     
  Misses          3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 23, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #175 will not alter performance

Comparing persormance-improve (b68699f) with main (e651c9c)

Summary

✅ 7 untouched benchmarks

@kamiazya kamiazya force-pushed the persormance-improve branch from be98672 to fb1fa5b Compare March 28, 2024 00:52
@kamiazya kamiazya force-pushed the persormance-improve branch from fb1fa5b to 2b178e1 Compare April 19, 2024 01:41
@kamiazya kamiazya force-pushed the persormance-improve branch from 2b178e1 to a5de9da Compare April 21, 2024 15:13
@kamiazya kamiazya marked this pull request as ready for review April 21, 2024 15:53
@kamiazya
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

@kamiazya kamiazya merged commit f3234a7 into main Apr 22, 2024
22 checks passed
@kamiazya kamiazya deleted the persormance-improve branch April 22, 2024 06:50
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant