test: added missing tests for the CronJob analyzer

[VaibhavMalik4187]

📑 Description

• Fixed a small bug where pre-analysis was incorrectly appended to the results every time at the end of the for loop. This caused the result for a single cronjob failure to be appended multiple times in the final results.

• Added missing test cases to ensure proper testing of the CronJob analyzer. The addition of these missing test cases has increased the code coverage of this analyzer to over 96%.

Partially Addresses: #889

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

[JuHyung-Son]

nice catch.

just one question.
i guess comparing failureText can occur unexpected test fail in the future even code is right.
how do you think?

[VaibhavMalik4187]

nice catch.

just one question. i guess comparing failureText can occur unexpected test fail in the future even code is right. how do you think?

Thanks,

Great question. I think you're right, there's a possibility of the failure text changing in the future and when that happens the test will break even though it shouldn't.

I've compared failureText in tests for others analyzers as well. Looks like now would be a great time to update them as well. Thought?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.24%. Comparing base (ebfbba9) to head (f426be7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1019      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.71%   67.24%   +1.53%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines        2549     2549              
==========================================
+ Hits         1675     1714      +39     
+ Misses        827      791      -36     
+ Partials       47       44       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JuHyung-Son]

nice catch.
just one question. i guess comparing failureText can occur unexpected test fail in the future even code is right. how do you think?

Thanks,

Great question. I think you're right, there's a possibility of the failure text changing in the future and when that happens the test will break even though it shouldn't.

I've compared failureText in tests for others analyzers as well. Looks like now would be a great time to update them as well. Thought?

yes. it needs to be. but not urgent. feel free to do that.

[JuHyung-Son]

much better.

thanks for stable tests.