Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ambiguous specification around execution_reply field #462

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2019

Conversation

takluyver
Copy link
Member

This fixes #129 and #443. The resolutions are up for debate, but these are the choices that I believe will require the least code to change - see the issues for details of what I looked at.

Copy link
Member

@captainsafia captainsafia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clarifying language looks good!

@minrk minrk merged commit 4738e6a into jupyter:master Jul 22, 2019
@minrk
Copy link
Member

minrk commented Jul 22, 2019

Thanks for fixing this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Doc discrepancy on iopub error message
3 participants