httptesting: fix for Go 1.6 #93
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The httptest.ResponseRecorder type has become more sophisticated, and our code was being a bit devious by constructing one without using the expected methods. Fix by using the expected methods to make the ResponseRecorder. We should eventually remove our use of ResponseRecorder entirely and fix all the code that uses httptesting, but we don't need to bite that bullet quite yet.
3d4ea00 to
eac86a6
Compare
|
👍 |
1 similar comment
|
👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The httptest.ResponseRecorder type has become more
sophisticated, and our code was being a bit devious
by constructing one without using the expected methods.
Fix by using the expected methods to make the ResponseRecorder.
We should eventually remove our use of ResponseRecorder entirely
and fix all the code that uses httptesting, but we don't
need to bite that bullet quite yet.
(Review request: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4317/)