Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DHL eCommerce 14-digit format #104

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

dan-jensen
Copy link

@dan-jensen dan-jensen commented Aug 25, 2024

This is intended to add support for DHL eCommerce tracking numbers that are 14 digits, which exist in Europe if nowhere else. This resolves jkeen/tracking_number#83

WARNING: Do not merge, there is a problem to resolve.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced DHL E-Commerce tracking number validation with support for an additional format.
    • Expanded the list of valid tracking numbers for improved testing and validation scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved flexibility in regex patterns for tracking number validation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the regex pattern for validating DHL E-Commerce tracking numbers in the couriers/dhl.json file. The original single regex has been replaced with an array of two regex patterns to accommodate different formats of valid tracking numbers. Additionally, three new valid tracking numbers have been added to the test numbers section for enhanced validation.

Changes

File Change Summary
couriers/dhl.json Changed regex from a string to an array of strings; added three new valid tracking numbers.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Valid DHL eCommerce tracking numbers should pass validation (#83)

🐰 In the land of DHL, the numbers now flow,
With patterns updated, they’re ready to go!
New digits added, a tracking delight,
E-Commerce journeys take wing in the night!
Hop along, dear friends, let the parcels play,
Validation's a breeze, hip-hip-hooray!
🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 939580e and 98e338f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • couriers/dhl.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
couriers/dhl.json (3)

51-54: LGTM!

The changes to the regex field enhance the flexibility of the tracking number validation by accommodating a new format. The new regex pattern is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


62-64: LGTM!

The addition of new valid tracking numbers helps in validating the new regex pattern. The tracking numbers are correctly formatted.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 1-65: LGTM!

The overall structure and consistency of the file are maintained. The changes are well-integrated within the existing configuration.

The code changes are approved.

"regex": "\\s*((GM)|(LX)|(RX)|(UV)|(CN)|(SG)|(TH)|(IN)|(HK)|(MY))\\s*(?<SerialNumber>([0-9]\\s*){10,39})",
"regex": [
"(\\s*((GM)|(LX)|(RX)|(UV)|(CN)|(SG)|(TH)|(IN)|(HK)|(MY))\\s*(?<SerialNumber>([0-9]\\s*){10,39}))",
"|^(?<SerialNumber>([0-9]){14})$"
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jkeen this pattern matches USPS 20-digit numbers (and possibly other formats), and apparently there is no validation mechanism (mod7/luhn/etc). So it seems we need to be clever.

As you see here, I tried wrapping it in line start/end syntax (^/$). However, this makes it un-usable for search blocks of text, and it fails the should_detect_number_variants test. Seems like the line start/end synax must be removed. Any ideas on how to modify this pattern so it does NOT match USPS 20-digits?

@fthobe
Copy link

fthobe commented Jan 5, 2025

@dan-jensen has this ever made it over the finish line?

@dan-jensen
Copy link
Author

@fthobe no, I wasn't sure how to proceed. My resolution was to stop using DHL eCommerce.

@fthobe
Copy link

fthobe commented Jan 15, 2025

@fthobe no, I wasn't sure how to proceed. My resolution was to stop using DHL eCommerce.

Did you migrate to regular DHL or to a different carrier entirely

@dan-jensen
Copy link
Author

@fthobe we try to avoid DHL entirely now. Their technology is such a mess it's almost un-usable. For example, their API frequently returns an error saying our account does not allow shipments to be purchased in a specific country, even though our DHL account rep says it should work. We tried to work with them for 18 months and finally gave up.

@fthobe
Copy link

fthobe commented Jan 15, 2025

They have a tendency to overpromise and underdeliver as all carriers. Any of them you have made better experience?

@dan-jensen
Copy link
Author

@fthobe haven't encountered any that are great, but FedEx and UPS are usable. I'm hopeful Amazon opens up to the public at some point, I think they would be great.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Valid DHL eCommerce tracking numbers fail validation
2 participants