forked from alshedivat/al-folio
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #46 from jinningwang/develop
Add the bolg my experience with open-source
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
37 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | ||
--- | ||
layout: post | ||
title: My Experience with Open-Source | ||
date: 2024-12-05 10:00:00 | ||
description: It is more than free of charge | ||
tags: [opinion, open-source] | ||
categories: blog | ||
thumbnail: | ||
featured: true | ||
giscus_comments: true | ||
toc: | ||
sidebar: false | ||
--- | ||
|
||
A detailed definition of “open-source software” is available at https://opensource.org/osd, version 1.9, last modified on 2007-03-22 | ||
|
||
# Background | ||
|
||
Having benefited greatly from open-source software and being one of the open-source community, I hold a deep appreciation and love for it. | ||
|
||
I view writing software as a creative endeavor, free from physical limits and material costs. Especially when there are no external milestones or deadlines, I can experiment with different implementations and architectures to achieve better performance, rather than rushing to meet a release date. | ||
|
||
# Open-source as Economically-Free | ||
|
||
According to the definition of “open-source software,” it does not require royalties or other fees. However, I want to emphasize that while you may not pay monetarily, developing and maintaining open-source software still requires significant effort. | ||
|
||
Some support comes from non-profit foundations, some from research funding, and some from the passion of developers. I believe nothing is truly “free” nowadays, much like how we pay for better daylighting even though no one owns the sunshine. Respect to the contributorss time and efforts, and contribute back when you are ready. | ||
|
||
# Open-source as Bug-Free | ||
|
||
There is no guarantee that any software is free of bugs. Whether software works as intended is often a matter of empirical judgment. The more the software is used, the more confidence we have in its results. The advantage of open-source software is that when it produces unexpected results, you have the option to inspect every detail, rather than passively waiting for customer support. | ||
|
||
There are some open source tools by the power systems community. Among them, MATPOWER is definitely a pioneer that lasts for more than 30 years. MATPOWER is so successful that when a project involves power flow and optimal power flow, the question often arises: “do your results match MATPOWER results?” It is so widely and extensively used that we don’t need to worry about its validity. However, for other younger projects, it is important be inclusive and patient for unexpected results. | ||
|
||
# Open-source for Research | ||
|
||
Open-source software often provides unique advantages over commercial alternatives, especially in research. When developing a new algorithm or method, you may need to modify the software to suit your specific needs. Open-source software allows for this flexibility, enabling you to adapt and customize the code as required. In contrast, many domain-specific commercial software solutions do not prioritize such flexibility, limiting your ability to make necessary adjustments. |