Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove hard coded surefire config #199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

jtnord
Copy link
Member

@jtnord jtnord commented Aug 9, 2023

the hard coded surefire config means it can not be overridden in CI or the CLI.

Whilst forkCount is the most pressing - if unlimited threads really are used, that would seem like an issue for people on slow computers, or VMs with not a lot of CPU.

amends: #198

Testing done

checked https://ci.jenkins.io/blue/organizations/jenkins/Plugins%2Fcopyartifact-plugin/detail/PR-199/1/pipeline/70#step-88-log-892 is still running multiple tests in parallel

Submitter checklist

Preview Give feedback

the hard coded surefire config means it can not be overridden in CI or the CLI.

Whilst forkCount is the most pressing - if unlimited threads really are used, that would seem like an issue for people on slow computers, or VMs with not a lot of CPU.
@jtnord jtnord requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2023 12:32
Copy link
Contributor

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite enabled auto-merge (squash) August 9, 2023 13:14
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite added the test label Aug 9, 2023
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite changed the title remove hard coded surefire config Remove hard coded surefire config Aug 9, 2023
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite merged commit 3a6e680 into jenkinsci:master Aug 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants