Add optional output to result

[timja]

cc @garethjevans

[jglick]

Hard to follow. Needs careful testing in both original and new mode in a variety of scenarios. Unfortunately I never figured out how to set up a compelling test environment, so I just did live experiments on a low-risk plugin like log-cli.

[timja]

Hard to follow. Needs careful testing in both original and new mode in a variety of scenarios. Unfortunately I never figured out how to set up a compelling test environment, so I just did live experiments on a low-risk plugin like log-cli.

I tested it fairly extensively by just setting variables in my shell and running locally, adjusting the commit status as required / other vars

[jglick]

So long as it is tested!

[timja]

can either of you see what's wrong @garethjevans or @jglick:

https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins-infra-test-plugin/runs/2195019274?check_suite_focus=true

the output is evaluating to empty:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins-infra-test-plugin/blob/master/.github/workflows/cd.yml

[jglick]

Disinclination to debug this sort of thing is why I selected a strategy of the minimal number of steps per workflow to begin with. 😁

[timja]

I was missing the ID in the action definition: b6ad93a