Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: force ts-expect-error and lint json files #820

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2021
Merged

Conversation

ferferga
Copy link
Member

@ferferga ferferga commented Mar 2, 2021

  • Force the use of @ts-expect-error instead of @ts-ignore
  • Does a basic json linting

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 2, 2021

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #820 (ac9009a) into master (1611457) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #820   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   12.08%   12.08%           
=======================================
  Files         137      137           
  Lines        3532     3532           
  Branches      527      527           
=======================================
  Hits          427      427           
  Misses       3082     3082           
  Partials       23       23           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1611457...ac9009a. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants