-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How is this package different from retrying? #73
Comments
Maybe provide links to here? |
Fixed in 8253e90 |
lutostag
added a commit
to lutostag/awesome-python-decorator
that referenced
this issue
Oct 17, 2017
Retrying is kind of abandoned, as per rholder/retrying#65 and jd/tenacity#73. A suggestion to move to the more actively maintained fork, while still giving a mention to the parent project. Thanks for a useful curated list!
lord63
pushed a commit
to lord63/awesome-python-decorator
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2017
Retrying is kind of abandoned, as per rholder/retrying#65 and jd/tenacity#73. A suggestion to move to the more actively maintained fork, while still giving a mention to the parent project. Thanks for a useful curated list!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What was the purpose of forking the retrying repo? This project's README is identical besides mentioning:
It might be helpful to add more documentation + a changelog that makes it easier for new users to decide whether to use this package vs.
retrying
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: