Allow us to specify "key" and "keys" in the fetch command #48
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is especially useful if you have large data sets on the server, and fetch pieces here and there using {keys: [...], add: true} each time you need more, and checking your collection locally for existence before making a remote call.
Apparently my coffeescript generator is different? Looks slightly more verbose.
|
Closing this PRQ, #51 is a better approach. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is especially useful if you have large data sets on the server, and fetch pieces here and there using {keys: [...], add: true} each time you need more, and checking your collection locally for existence before making a remote call.
Apparently my coffeescript generator is different? Looks slightly more verbose.
NB: This is reopened from my prior PRQ due to that one not being in the right branch. Sorry for the confusion.