Version 0.5.1 #830
Version 0.5.1 #830
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves modifications to the Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
plane/plane-tests/Cargo.toml (1)
17-17: Dependency change looks good, but consider adding a version specifier.The
dynamic-proxydependency has been correctly replaced withplane-dynamic-proxy, which aligns with the PR objectives. The path is correct.Consider adding a version specifier to the
plane-dynamic-proxydependency to ensure consistency with other packages. For example:plane-dynamic-proxy = { path = "../../dynamic-proxy", version = "0.5.1" }This would make it explicit that we're using version 0.5.1 of the renamed crate.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- dynamic-proxy/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- plane/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
- plane/plane-tests/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- dynamic-proxy/Cargo.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
plane/plane-tests/Cargo.toml (1)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version has been correctly updated to 0.5.1, which is consistent with the PR objectives and the changes in other packages.
plane/Cargo.toml (1)
3-3: Version update looks good.The package version has been correctly updated to 0.5.1, which aligns with the PR objectives.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_websocket.rs (1)
Line range hint
41-51: Consider improving error handling and kudos on concurrent upgrade handling.The changes to the
callmethod have introduced some improvements, but there are areas that could be further enhanced:
Error Handling: The use of
unwrap()onclient.request(request).awaitcould lead to panics if the request fails. Consider using?operator or explicit error handling to provide more graceful failure scenarios.Concurrent Upgrade Handling: Spawning the upgrade handler in a separate asynchronous task is a good practice. It allows the WebSocket connection to be handled concurrently without blocking the main execution flow.
Here's a suggested improvement for error handling:
Box::pin(async move { match client.request(request).await { Ok((res, Some(upgrade_handler))) => { tokio::spawn(async move { if let Err(e) = upgrade_handler.run().await { eprintln!("Error in upgrade handler: {:?}", e); } }); Ok(res) } Ok((res, None)) => Ok(res), Err(e) => Err(Box::new(e) as Box<dyn std::error::Error + Send + Sync>), } })This approach provides more robust error handling and logging, while maintaining the concurrent upgrade handler execution.
dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_request.rs (1)
Line range hint
119-139: Consider creating an issue for the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates that there's pending work on re-implementing timeout handling. To ensure this doesn't get overlooked, it might be beneficial to create a GitHub issue to track this task.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue for tracking the re-implementation of timeout handling?
plane/src/proxy/proxy_server.rs (3)
Line range hint
46-73: Implemented Root Path Redirection incallMethodThe
callmethod now handles requests to the root path ("/"). If aroot_redirect_urlis provided, it responds with aMOVED_PERMANENTLY(301) status and includes aLocationheader for redirection. If not, it returns aBAD_REQUEST(400) status. The logic is sound and correctly incorporated.If the redirection is intended to be temporary, consider using
StatusCode::FOUND(302) instead ofMOVED_PERMANENTLY(301). Choose the status code that best reflects the desired client behavior.
Line range hint
76-78: Appropriate Handling of Missing Bearer TokenWhen the bearer token is missing after parsing the URI, the code returns a
BAD_REQUEST(400) status. While this is acceptable, consider usingUNAUTHORIZED(401) to indicate that authentication is required.Returning
UNAUTHORIZED(401) might more accurately reflect that the request lacks valid authentication credentials.
Line range hint
102-107: Error Handling in Proxy Request ExecutionErrors encountered during the proxy request are logged, and an
INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR(500) status is returned to the client. This is appropriate; however, ensure that error logs do not expose sensitive information.Review the error logging to ensure that no sensitive data is included in the logged errors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/common/hello_world_service.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/common/simple_upgrade_service.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs (2 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful_https.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/hello_world_http.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/https_test.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_http_redirect.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_http_versions.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_request.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_websocket.rs (1 hunks)
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_upgrade.rs (1 hunks)
- plane/plane-tests/tests/common/proxy_mock.rs (1 hunks)
- plane/plane-tests/tests/common/test_env.rs (1 hunks)
- plane/src/proxy/cert_manager.rs (1 hunks)
- plane/src/proxy/cert_pair.rs (1 hunks)
- plane/src/proxy/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- plane/src/proxy/proxy_server.rs (1 hunks)
- plane/src/proxy/request.rs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- plane/src/proxy/request.rs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs (2)
Learnt from: paulgb PR: jamsocket/plane#814 File: dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs:46-60 Timestamp: 2024-09-24T19:32:37.996Z Learning: In the `test_graceful_shutdown()` test in `dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs`, if the server has not shut down, the response will be returned immediately, failing the test, so adding a timeout is unnecessary.Learnt from: paulgb PR: jamsocket/plane#814 File: dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs:46-60 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:32:21.105Z Learning: In the `test_graceful_shutdown()` test in `dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs`, if the server has not shut down, the response will be returned immediately, failing the test, so adding a timeout is unnecessary.
🔇 Additional comments (28)
dynamic-proxy/tests/hello_world_http.rs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been successfully updated to use the new crate name
plane_dynamic_proxy. This change is consistent with the PR objectives of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate.Let's verify that this change has been applied consistently across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import renaming verified successfully.
All imports of the
servermodule now consistently use the new crate nameplane_dynamic_proxy. No remaining references todynamic_proxy::serverwere found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of the server module use the new crate name # Test: Search for any remaining imports from the old crate name rg 'use dynamic_proxy::server' # Test: Confirm that the new crate name is used consistently rg 'use plane_dynamic_proxy::server'Length of output: 1036
dynamic-proxy/tests/https_test.rs (2)
Line range hint
8-38: No changes required in the test function.The test function
test_httpsremains valid after the import change. TheHttpsConfigandSimpleHttpServertypes are correctly used, and no further modifications are necessary.
2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The import change from
dynamic_proxy::servertoplane_dynamic_proxy::serveris correct and aligns with the PR objectives of renaming the crate.Let's verify that this change is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import renaming verified across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old crate name # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports of the old crate name echo "Searching for any remaining imports of 'dynamic_proxy'" rg -i "use\s+dynamic_proxy" # Test 2: Search for any remaining references to the old crate name in Cargo.toml files echo "Searching for any remaining references to 'dynamic_proxy' in Cargo.toml files" rg -i "dynamic_proxy" $(fd -g "Cargo.toml") # Expected results: # - Both searches should return no results, indicating that all references have been updated.Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for any remaining references to 'dynamic_proxy' # Test 1: Search for 'dynamic_proxy' in all Rust source files excluding build directories echo "Searching for 'dynamic_proxy' in Rust source files" rg -i "dynamic_proxy" --type rust --glob '!node_modules/*' --glob '!dist/*' --glob '!build/*' # Test 2: Search for 'dynamic_proxy' in documentation files (README.md, docs/) echo "Searching for 'dynamic_proxy' in documentation files" rg -i "dynamic_proxy" --type md --type txt --glob 'docs/**/*' # Test 3: Search for 'dynamic_proxy' in comments within Rust source files echo "Searching for 'dynamic_proxy' in comments within Rust source files" rg -i "//.*dynamic_proxy" --type rustLength of output: 2651
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Accurate search for any remaining standalone references to 'dynamic_proxy' # Test 1: Search for exact 'dynamic_proxy' in all Rust source files excluding build directories echo "Searching for exact 'dynamic_proxy' in Rust source files" rg -i "\bdynamic_proxy\b" --type rust --glob '!node_modules/*' --glob '!dist/*' --glob '!build/*' # Test 2: Search for exact 'dynamic_proxy' in documentation files (README.md, docs/) echo "Searching for exact 'dynamic_proxy' in documentation files" rg -i "\bdynamic_proxy\b" --type md --type txt --glob 'docs/**/*' # Test 3: Search for exact 'dynamic_proxy' in comments within Rust source files echo "Searching for exact 'dynamic_proxy' in comments within Rust source files" rg -i "//.*\bdynamic_proxy\b" --type rustLength of output: 634
dynamic-proxy/tests/common/hello_world_service.rs (1)
4-4: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated to use
plane_dynamic_proxy::bodyinstead ofdynamic_proxy::body, which aligns with the PR objective of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate toplane-dynamic-proxy.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any missed import updates and confirm the widespread adoption of the new crate name.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All import statements have been updated to
plane_dynamic_proxy::.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports from dynamic_proxy have been updated to plane_dynamic_proxy # Test: Search for any remaining imports from dynamic_proxy. Expect: No results. rg "use dynamic_proxy::" -g '!Cargo.toml' # Test: Confirm that plane_dynamic_proxy is now used. Expect: Multiple results. rg "use plane_dynamic_proxy::"Length of output: 2031
dynamic-proxy/tests/test_http_versions.rs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Verify test execution after the rename.The import statement has been correctly updated to use the new crate name
plane_dynamic_proxy. This change aligns with the PR objectives of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate.To ensure the tests are still functioning correctly after the rename, please run the following command:
dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs (2)
3-4: LGTM: Import statements correctly updatedThe import statements have been properly updated to reflect the renaming of the
dynamic-proxycrate toplane-dynamic-proxy. This change is consistent with the PR objectives and ensures that the correct modules are imported.
14-14: LGTM: Function signature correctly updatedThe return type in the
slow_hello_worldfunction signature has been properly updated to useplane_dynamic_proxy::body::SimpleBodyinstead ofdynamic_proxy::body::SimpleBody. This change aligns with the crate renaming and ensures type consistency.dynamic-proxy/tests/test_http_redirect.rs (1)
Line range hint
6-89: LGTM! Test logic remains intact and comprehensive.The core functionality of the tests has not been altered, which is appropriate given that only the module name has changed. The tests continue to cover various scenarios for HTTP to HTTPS redirection, including:
- Basic redirection
- Redirection with slash path
- Redirection with a specific path
- Redirection with query parameters
This comprehensive test suite ensures that the redirection behavior remains correct after the module rename.
dynamic-proxy/tests/test_upgrade.rs (1)
9-9: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the new crate name
plane_dynamic_proxy, which is consistent with the PR objectives of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate.Let's verify that this change is consistent across the entire codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Import statements updated consistently across the codebase.
All server module imports are using the new crate name
plane_dynamic_proxy.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of the server module use the new crate name # Test: Search for any remaining imports from the old crate name old_imports=$(rg -i "use\s+dynamic_proxy::server") if [ -n "$old_imports" ]; then echo "Found old imports that need to be updated:" echo "$old_imports" else echo "All server module imports are using the new crate name." fi # Test: Confirm that the new import is used consistently new_imports=$(rg -i "use\s+plane_dynamic_proxy::server") echo "New imports found:" echo "$new_imports"Length of output: 3202
dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful_https.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-78: Confirmed: No further changes needed in the file.The import changes are sufficient, and no modifications are required in the rest of the file. The test function
test_graceful_shutdown_httpscontinues to useSimpleHttpServer,HttpsConfig, andto_simple_bodycorrectly with the updated imports.
4-6: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The import statements have been successfully updated to use the new
plane_dynamic_proxymodule instead ofdynamic_proxy. This change aligns with the PR objectives of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate toplane-dynamic-proxy.To ensure consistency, let's verify that no other occurrences of
dynamic_proxyremain in the file:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: No remaining 'dynamic_proxy' occurrences found.
All instances of
dynamic_proxyhave been successfully updated toplane_dynamic_proxyindynamic-proxy/tests/graceful_https.rs.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of 'dynamic_proxy' in the file. # Test: Search for 'dynamic_proxy' in the file. Expect: No matches. rg 'dynamic_proxy' dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful_https.rsLength of output: 200
dynamic-proxy/tests/common/simple_upgrade_service.rs (1)
12-12: LGTM! Verify consistent import updates across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated to use the new
plane_dynamic_proxymodule name, which aligns with the PR objectives of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate. The change is isolated and doesn't affect the rest of the file's functionality.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script to verify that all relevant imports have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
All import statements successfully updated to
plane_dynamic_proxyacross the codebase.No remaining instances of
dynamic_proxy::were found, and all imports now correctly referenceplane_dynamic_proxy::.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of dynamic_proxy have been updated to plane_dynamic_proxy # Test 1: Search for any remaining imports of dynamic_proxy echo "Checking for any remaining imports of dynamic_proxy:" rg "use dynamic_proxy::" -g '!Cargo.toml' # Test 2: Verify that plane_dynamic_proxy is now being used echo "Verifying usage of plane_dynamic_proxy:" rg "use plane_dynamic_proxy::" # Note: If Test 1 returns results or Test 2 doesn't, manual review may be needed.Length of output: 2235
plane/plane-tests/tests/common/proxy_mock.rs (1)
6-6: LGTM! Verify consistent renaming across the project.The import statement has been correctly updated to use the new crate name
plane_dynamic_proxy. This change aligns with the PR objectives of renaming the 'dynamic-proxy' crate.To ensure consistency across the project, run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old crate name:
✅ Verification successful
Consistent renaming confirmed across the project.
All references todynamic_proxyhave been successfully updated toplane_dynamic_proxy.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'dynamic_proxy' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'dynamic_proxy' usage. Expect: No results or only in comments/documentation. rg 'dynamic_proxy' --type rustLength of output: 2099
dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_websocket.rs (2)
5-9: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use
plane_dynamic_proxyinstead ofdynamic_proxy, which is consistent with the package renaming mentioned in the PR objectives. The imported items remain the same, ensuring that the functionality is preserved.
Line range hint
1-109: Summary: Package renaming implemented correctly, with minor suggestions for improvement.The changes in this file successfully implement the package renaming from "dynamic-proxy" to "plane-dynamic-proxy" as outlined in the PR objectives. The import statements have been updated correctly, and the
SimpleProxyServiceimplementation has been enhanced with concurrent upgrade handling.The main test function
test_websocket_echoremains unchanged, which is appropriate as its functionality should not be affected by the package renaming.Overall, the changes are consistent and maintain the existing functionality. The suggested improvement for error handling in the
SimpleProxyService::callmethod would further enhance the robustness of the code.dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_request.rs (1)
5-7: LGTM! Import statements updated correctly.The changes to the import statements are consistent with the PR objectives. The
dynamic-proxycrate has been correctly renamed toplane-dynamic-proxy, and the explicit imports ofhttpandhttp_body_utilimprove code clarity.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that all other test files have been updated similarly:
✅ Verification successful
Import statements successfully updated across all test files.
Verified that all test files in
dynamic-proxy/testsnow useplane_dynamic_proxyand no instances ofdynamic_proxyremain.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test files in the dynamic-proxy directory have been updated to use the new import. # Test: Search for the new import in all test files rg -t rust 'use plane_dynamic_proxy' dynamic-proxy/tests # Test: Ensure no old imports remain rg -t rust 'use dynamic_proxy' dynamic-proxy/testsLength of output: 1396
plane/src/proxy/mod.rs (1)
6-8: LGTM! Verify consistency across the project.The import statement has been correctly updated to use
plane_dynamic_proxy::serverinstead ofdynamic_proxy::server. This change aligns with the project's goal of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate toplane-dynamic-proxy.To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script:
This will help ensure that the renaming has been applied consistently throughout the Rust files in the project.
plane/src/proxy/cert_pair.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Consistency confirmed: Changes align with PR objectives and AI summary.The modifications in this file are limited to updating import paths, which is consistent with the PR objectives of renaming
dynamic-proxytoplane-dynamic-proxy. The AI summary accurately captured these changes. No unexpected modifications or inconsistencies were found in the rest of the file.plane/plane-tests/tests/common/test_env.rs (1)
27-27: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the new crate name
plane-dynamic-proxy, which is consistent with the PR objectives of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that all other occurrences of
dynamic_proxyhave been updated:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.
The import statement has been updated to use the new crate name
plane_dynamic_proxy, which is consistent with the PR objectives of renaming thedynamic-proxycrate. All other occurrences ofdynamic_proxyhave been successfully updated across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of 'dynamic_proxy' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'dynamic_proxy' in all files. Expect: No occurrences outside of comments or strings. rg -n 'dynamic_proxy' --type rustLength of output: 2152
plane/src/proxy/proxy_server.rs (8)
Line range hint
8-13: Import Path Updated Correctly toplane_dynamic_proxyThe import path has been successfully updated to
plane_dynamic_proxy, reflecting the renaming of the crate. This ensures that all references align with the new package name.
Line range hint
21-24: Addedroot_redirect_urlField toProxyStateInnerThe addition of the
root_redirect_url: Option<String>field to theProxyStateInnerstruct allows for optional root path redirection. This enhancement is properly implemented.
Line range hint
29-31:newMethod Updated to Acceptroot_redirect_urlThe
newmethod now accepts aroot_redirect_urlparameter, aligning with the updatedProxyStateInnerstruct. The initialization correctly sets this value.
Line range hint
83-85: Correct Error Handling for URI ConstructionThe code checks if the reconstructed URI is valid and returns a
BAD_REQUEST(400) status if not. This ensures that malformed requests are appropriately rejected.
Line range hint
123-138: Enhanced Host and Subdomain Validation inprepare_requestThe
prepare_requestfunction now includes validation of theHostheader against the expected cluster and subdomain. This strengthens security by ensuring that requests are properly scoped.
Line range hint
140-155: Removed Inboundx-verified-*HeadersThe code removes any inbound headers starting with
x-verified-to prevent header spoofing. This is a good security practice to ensure that these headers are set only by the proxy.
Line range hint
176-184: Applied General Response Headers Including CORSThe
apply_general_headersfunction sets common headers for all responses, such asAccess-Control-Allow-Origin,Access-Control-Allow-Methods,Access-Control-Allow-Headers, and theServername. This implementation correctly ensures that clients can interact with the server without CORS issues.
Line range hint
157-169: Set Special Plane Headers for Verified InformationSpecial headers such as
x-verified-username,x-verified-user-data,x-verified-path,x-verified-backend, andx-verified-secretare added to the request. While this facilitates passing verified information to the backend, exposingx-verified-secretmay pose a security risk.Please verify whether including
x-verified-secretin the headers sent to the backend is necessary and safe. Ensure that this does not expose sensitive tokens that could be misused if intercepted.Run the following script to identify where
x-verified-secretis used in the codebase and assess its implications:The script will help you audit the usage of this header to ensure it doesn't introduce security vulnerabilities.
plane/src/proxy/cert_manager.rs (1)
13-13: Verify that all import paths have been updated toplane_dynamic_proxyThe import path has been updated to
plane_dynamic_proxy, which aligns with the renaming of the crate for publishing. Please ensure that all references todynamic_proxyhave been updated throughout the codebase to prevent any import errors.Run the following script to check for remaining references to
dynamic_proxy:✅ Verification successful
All import paths successfully updated to
plane_dynamic_proxy🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any occurrences of 'dynamic_proxy' in the codebase # Search for 'dynamic_proxy' in all files, excluding 'Cargo.lock' and the 'target' directory rg 'dynamic_proxy' --glob '!*Cargo.lock' --glob '!target/*'Length of output: 2128
| use http::{header, StatusCode}; | ||
| use plane_dynamic_proxy::{ | ||
| https_redirect::HttpsRedirectService, | ||
| server::{HttpsConfig, SimpleHttpServer}, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining references to dynamic_proxy found.
The following files still contain references to dynamic_proxy that need to be updated:
- dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_upgrade.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_websocket.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_proxy_request.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_http_versions.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/test_http_redirect.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/https_test.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/hello_world_http.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/graceful_https.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/common/simple_upgrade_service.rs
- dynamic-proxy/tests/common/hello_world_service.rs
- plane/src/proxy/request.rs
- plane/src/proxy/cert_manager.rs
- plane/src/proxy/proxy_server.rs
- plane/src/proxy/mod.rs
- plane/src/proxy/cert_pair.rs
- plane/plane-tests/tests/common/proxy_mock.rs
- plane/plane-tests/tests/common/test_env.rs
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Import statements updated correctly.
The changes to the import statements are in line with the PR objectives. The dynamic_proxy module has been correctly renamed to plane_dynamic_proxy, and the necessary http module has been imported.
Let's verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of dynamic_proxy have been updated to plane_dynamic_proxy
# Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of dynamic_proxy
echo "Checking for any remaining imports of dynamic_proxy:"
rg "use dynamic_proxy"
# Test 2: Verify the new imports of plane_dynamic_proxy
echo "Verifying new imports of plane_dynamic_proxy:"
rg "use plane_dynamic_proxy"
# Test 3: Check for any missed renames in comments or strings
echo "Checking for any missed renames in comments or strings:"
rg "dynamic_proxy" -g "!Cargo.toml"
Length of output: 4452
| use pem::Pem; | ||
| use plane_dynamic_proxy::rustls::{ | ||
| crypto::aws_lc_rs::sign::any_supported_type, pki_types::PrivateKeyDer, | ||
| }; | ||
| use dynamic_proxy::tokio_rustls::rustls::sign::CertifiedKey; | ||
| use pem::Pem; | ||
| use plane_dynamic_proxy::tokio_rustls::rustls::sign::CertifiedKey; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove unused import: pem::Pem is imported but not used in plane/src/proxy/cert_pair.rs.
- Consider eliminating the
use pem::Pem;statement to clean up the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives.
The updated import paths for rustls and tokio_rustls from plane_dynamic_proxy are consistent with the PR objectives of renaming the dynamic-proxy crate to plane-dynamic-proxy. This change ensures that the code correctly references the new package structure.
To verify the usage of the newly imported pem::Pem, let's run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of pem::Pem in the file
# Test: Search for pem::Pem usage
rg 'pem::Pem' plane/src/proxy/cert_pair.rs
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any usage of Pem in cert_pair.rs excluding the import line
# Search for 'Pem' as a whole word, excluding lines that import it
rg '\\bPem\\b' plane/src/proxy/cert_pair.rs | grep -v 'use pem::Pem;'
Length of output: 71
Version 0.5.0 was not published to crates.io because it depended on the repo-local crate
dynamic-proxy.This bumps the version to 0.5.1, and renames
dynamic-proxytoplane-dynamic-proxywith the intent of publishing it as its own crate. (At least for now, I like this better than incorporating it in Plane, because it has its own test suite that we would have to co-mingle with Plane's if we were to merge them)