-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug] Span SumF is slower than a for loop over a span #21
Comments
Via the use of the "Coming out faster"
|
Smurf-IV
pushed a commit
to Smurf-IV/LinqFaster
that referenced
this issue
Aug 1, 2019
- Fix code to make it appear "As fast" Via the use of the "Coming out faster" acum = accum + nextVal method - Add ReadOnlySpan to `SumF` api's
Smurf-IV
pushed a commit
to Smurf-IV/LinqFaster
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2019
…er a span Create jackmott#22: [Question] Span_FirstF and List_FirstF are slower than just calling foreach -> Why? Span this jackmott#24: [Enhancement] DefaultIfEmptyF should be implemented Add Span jackmott#25: [Enhancement] Please also target .net4.8 and Benchmark
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: