Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v3.0.4 #753

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 24, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change OpenSSF
vitest (source) devDependencies patch 3.0.3 -> 3.0.4 OpenSSF Scorecard

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v3.0.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* 0-3 * * 1" in timezone Europe/Berlin, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated vitest dependency to version 3.0.4

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 10:05
@renovate renovate bot added the Type: Dependency The issue is a dependency update. label Jan 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request involves a minor version update of the vitest dependency in the refarch-webcomponent/package.json file, incrementing the version from 3.0.3 to 3.0.4. The change is a small, targeted update to a testing library version with no other modifications to the project configuration.

Changes

File Change Summary
refarch-webcomponent/package.json Updated vitest dependency version from 3.0.3 to 3.0.4

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Template: Webcomponent

Suggested reviewers

  • devtobi

Poem

🐰 A tiny version hop, so neat
Vitest updates, a testing treat
From 3.0.3 to 3.0.4 we go
A rabbit's leap of code, just so!
Small change, big smile 🧪✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f417dcf and 0a438eb.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • refarch-webcomponent/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • refarch-webcomponent/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build (refarch-backend)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
refarch-webcomponent/package.json (1)

39-39: LGTM! The vitest update looks safe to merge.

The update from v3.0.3 to v3.0.4 is a patch release containing bug fixes and improvements. The changes are particularly relevant for this project as they include enhanced support for Vite 6, which this project uses.

Let's verify the compatibility with the current setup:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: The vitest update is safe to apply

The verification of both components' test setups confirms that:

  • Both projects use standard vitest APIs and configurations
  • The test environments are properly configured
  • No compatibility issues were found between vitest 3.0.4 and the current setup
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify vitest compatibility with current dependencies

# Check if package-lock.json exists and contains any peer dependency warnings
if [ -f package-lock.json ]; then
  echo "Checking package-lock.json for peer dependency warnings..."
  cat package-lock.json | jq -r '.packages | .[] | select(.peerDependencies != null) | select(.name == "vitest")'
fi

# Check if there are any GitHub issues reporting compatibility problems between vitest 3.0.4 and Vite 6
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  search(query: "repo:vitest-dev/vitest is:issue state:open vitest 3.0.4 vite 6", type: ISSUE, first: 5) {
    nodes {
      ... on Issue {
        title
        url
        labels(first: 5) {
          nodes {
            name
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 474


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for lock files and test setup
echo "=== Checking for lock files ==="
ls -la *.lock pnpm-lock.yaml 2>/dev/null || echo "No lock files found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking for vitest config ==="
fd -e js -e ts -e mjs "vitest.config" || echo "No vitest config found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking for test files ==="
fd -e spec.ts -e spec.js -e test.ts -e test.js || echo "No test files found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json test script ==="
if [ -f package.json ]; then
    jq '.scripts.test' package.json
fi

Length of output: 694


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Checking vitest config content ==="
for config in refarch-frontend/vitest.config.ts refarch-webcomponent/vitest.config.ts; do
    echo -e "\nContent of $config:"
    cat "$config"
done

echo -e "\n=== Checking test file content ==="
for test in refarch-frontend/tests/unit/example.spec.ts refarch-webcomponent/tests/unit/example.spec.ts; do
    echo -e "\nContent of $test:"
    cat "$test"
done

Length of output: 3152


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Template: Webcomponent Issues regarding the webcomponent template. label Jan 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@devtobi devtobi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@devtobi devtobi merged commit 907cf50 into main Jan 24, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@devtobi devtobi deleted the renovate/refarch-webcomponent-vitest-monorepo branch January 24, 2025 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Template: Webcomponent Issues regarding the webcomponent template. Type: Dependency The issue is a dependency update.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant