Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ZMS-3507): redirect without appointment #775

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

manjencic
Copy link
Contributor

@manjencic manjencic commented Jan 17, 2025

Description

Short description or comments

Reference

Issues #XXX

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • UI Changes

    • Modified the process redirection button to always be visible, regardless of appointment status
    • Adjusted button placement for "Weiterleiten" and "Parken" actions
  • Backend Improvements

    • Updated process redirection logic to use queue number as identifier when available, falling back to process ID

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to a Twig template and a PHP class related to process redirection. In the template, the "Weiterleiten" button is now always rendered, removing the previous conditional display. In the PHP class, the process redirection method now uses a more flexible approach to determine the identifier for redirection, checking for a queue number before falling back to the process ID.

Changes

File Change Summary
zmsadmin/templates/block/process/info.twig Removed conditional rendering of "Weiterleiten" button; now always displayed
zmsapi/src/Zmsapi/ProcessRedirect.php Modified readResponse method to use queue number as redirection identifier if available

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Template
    participant ProcessRedirect
    
    User->>Template: View process info
    Template->>User: Always show "Weiterleiten" button
    User->>ProcessRedirect: Redirect process
    alt Queue number exists
        ProcessRedirect->>ProcessRedirect: Use queue number
    else
        ProcessRedirect->>ProcessRedirect: Use process ID
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Redirect Tale 🔀

Buttons now shine, no longer shy,
Queue numbers dance, identifiers fly,
Processes leap with newfound grace,
A flexible path in digital space,
Redirecting dreams with bunny might! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
zmsapi/src/Zmsapi/ProcessRedirect.php (1)

57-57: Add a comment explaining the fallback logic.

Consider adding a comment to explain why we prefer queue numbers over process IDs and when the fallback occurs.

+            // Prefer queue numbers for better user experience, fallback to process ID for legacy cases
             $process->queue['number'] ?? $process->id,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71d5bec and 934e92d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • zmsadmin/templates/block/process/info.twig (1 hunks)
  • zmsapi/src/Zmsapi/ProcessRedirect.php (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: call-unit-tests / zmsapi-test
  • GitHub Check: call-unit-tests / zmsdb-test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
zmsadmin/templates/block/process/info.twig (1)

63-64: LGTM! Changes align with feature requirements.

The unconditional rendering of the "Weiterleiten" button now enables process redirection regardless of appointment status, which directly implements the PR objective. Button styling and placement are consistent with the UI pattern.

zmsapi/src/Zmsapi/ProcessRedirect.php (1)

57-57: Verify security implications of using queue numbers.

While the implementation correctly handles both appointment and non-appointment cases, using queue numbers (which are typically sequential) instead of process IDs could potentially expose the system to enumeration attacks.

Run this script to analyze the usage of queue numbers in redirection:

✅ Verification successful

Queue number usage is secure in this context

The implementation is safe because:

  • Queue numbers are scoped to specific workstations/scopes
  • Access requires proper authentication via X-Authkey
  • Route validation prevents malformed input
  • Direct enumeration is not possible without authentication
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential security measures around queue number usage

# Look for queue number validation or rate limiting
rg -A 5 "queue.*number" --type php

# Check for existing security measures in process redirection
ast-grep --pattern 'class ProcessRedirect {
  $$$
  protected function test$_($_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 18884

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants