-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 755
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CI] Update sycl-windows-run-tests.yml #16621
Conversation
Added inputs.build_ref, which is used but not declared.
@@ -18,6 +18,16 @@ on: | |||
ref: | |||
type: string | |||
required: False | |||
build_ref: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we add a description
explaining the difference between build_ref
and ref
? thx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it better? 649afb6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
still unclear to me build_ref
vs ref
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Me too:D it's not me who created this. Probably we can just use ref in both cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or, I don't know the original intent to have ref
and build_ref
, but may be it's to have a possibility to download the devops
dir and the rest repo from different branches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as far as i know theres only a single ref that checks out the source branch for tests to run, if its not too much work maybe we try combining the two
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed build_ref
. Also converted to draft so I can test it without random merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool, ping me again when youre ready for review/merge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm afraid even we'd do some digging/archeology on git history, the result would it just happened without well-defined purpose behind it. Reviewing all *ref
and removing/unifying unnecessary sounds like the right path forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ready for merge
cool, ping me again when youre ready for review/merge
Added merge_ref to inputs. Use ref instead of undeclared build_ref.