Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency typedoc to v0.25.7 #161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
typedoc (source) 0.25.4 -> 0.25.7 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

TypeStrong/TypeDoc (typedoc)

v0.25.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Fixed an issue where a namespace would not be created for merged function-namespaces only containing types, #​2476.
  • Fixed an infinite loop when converting a union type which directly contained another union type which refers to itself, #​2469.

v0.25.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Fixed infinite loop caused by a fix for some complicated union/intersection types, #​2468.
  • Improved infinite loop detection in type converter to reduce false positives.

v0.25.5

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "monthly" in timezone Asia/Tokyo, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typedoc-0.x branch from 96c7b0c to e97e7ca Compare January 31, 2024 23:19
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 6a66df1 into main Feb 1, 2024
1 check passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typedoc-0.x branch February 1, 2024 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants