Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump go version on lint workflow #117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

chore: bump go version on lint workflow #117

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

Vritra4
Copy link
Contributor

@Vritra4 Vritra4 commented Oct 23, 2024

Description

golangci-lint built on go@v1.22 crashes while linting go@v1.23-based modules

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the Go version in the GitHub Actions workflow from 1.22 to 1.23 for improved environment setup.
    • Specified workflow triggers to execute linting only for relevant Go files, optimizing performance.

@Vritra4 Vritra4 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 11:27
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the .github/workflows/lint.yml file, specifically changing the Go version from 1.22 to 1.23 for the GitHub Actions workflow. The workflow now specifies that linting will only trigger for modifications to Go files, go.mod, and go.sum. The overall structure and logic of the workflow remain unchanged, with no modifications to the concurrency settings or the steps involved in checking out the repository and running linting commands.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint.yml Updated go-version from 1.22 to 1.23 and specified linting triggers for Go files, go.mod, and go.sum. No changes to logic or concurrency settings.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Linter

    User->>GitHub Actions: Push changes to Go files
    GitHub Actions->>Linter: Trigger linting process
    Linter->>GitHub Actions: Run linting on modified files
    GitHub Actions->>User: Return linting results
Loading

🐇 "In the garden where code does bloom,
A new Go version lifts the gloom.
With linting paths now clear and bright,
We hop along with pure delight!
So let’s code on, with joy and cheer,
For every change brings us near!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:

Warning: Go 1.23 compatibility issues with golangci-lint v1.61.0

There are multiple reported issues with golangci-lint running on Go 1.23, including memory consumption problems (#4909, #4908) and configuration issues (#4950). While these issues have been marked as closed, they indicate potential instability when using golangci-lint with Go 1.23.

Recommendations:

  • Use Go 1.22.x instead, which has proven stable with golangci-lint v1.61.0
  • If Go 1.23 is required, monitor memory usage carefully and consider setting memory limits in CI/CD environment
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 27-33: Verify golangci-lint version compatibility.

The workflow uses golangci-lint v1.61.0. Let's verify its compatibility with Go 1.23.


Let me gather more information about Go 1.23 compatibility by checking the repository's documentation and configuration files.


Let me check the Go version compatibility by looking at the golangci-lint repository.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check golangci-lint release notes and issues for Go 1.23 compatibility
# Test: Search for any compatibility issues or requirements for Go 1.23

# Check the golangci-lint releases page for Go 1.23 support
gh release view v1.61.0 --repo golangci/golangci-lint

# Search for any open issues related to Go 1.23 compatibility
gh issue list --repo golangci/golangci-lint --search "go 1.23 in:title,body"

Length of output: 5581


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check go.mod and other configuration files for Go version requirements
rg -A 5 "go \d+\.\d+" --type yaml --type mod

# Check if there are any specific Go version requirements in the documentation
rg -i "go.*(version|requirement|compatibility)" README.md docs/ 2>/dev/null

# Look for any Go version related configuration
fd "go\." --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 193509


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check golangci-lint repository for Go version support
gh repo view golangci/golangci-lint | grep -A 5 "About"

# Check if there are any Go version related issues or discussions
gh issue list --repo golangci/golangci-lint --search "go 1.23" --state all

Length of output: 1674

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 414508a and 6add094.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (2)

33-33: LGTM: Go version update for golangci job.

The update to Go 1.23 aligns with the PR objective to fix the golangci-lint crashes.


75-75: LGTM: Go version update for tidy job.

The Go version is consistently updated across both jobs, maintaining version parity.

Comment on lines +33 to 34
go-version: 1.23
check-latest: true
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider pinning to a specific Go patch version.

Using check-latest: true with go-version: 1.23 could lead to non-deterministic builds if a new patch version is released. Consider pinning to a specific patch version (e.g., 1.23.0) to ensure consistent builds.

Apply this change to both setup-go steps:

-          go-version: 1.23
+          go-version: 1.23.0
           check-latest: true

Also applies to: 75-76

@Vritra4 Vritra4 requested a review from beer-1 October 23, 2024 11:34
Copy link
Member

@beer-1 beer-1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit 851f016 into main Oct 23, 2024
3 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the fix/lint-workflow branch October 23, 2024 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants