Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add coralogix dialect to opentelemetry #11622

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 8, 2022

Conversation

povilasv
Copy link
Contributor

@povilasv povilasv commented Aug 4, 2022

Required for all PRs

resolves #

Added an Coralogix dialect to opentelemetry output plugin so that users can send metrics to Coralogix.

@telegraf-tiger telegraf-tiger bot added the feat Improvement on an existing feature such as adding a new setting/mode to an existing plugin label Aug 4, 2022
@povilasv povilasv mentioned this pull request Aug 4, 2022
3 tasks
Copy link
Member

@srebhan srebhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow this is really nice @povilasv! Thanks for your effort! I've a suggestion regarding the configuration scheme and like to ask you to give users some more guidance by adding some more help to the README. What do you think?

@srebhan srebhan self-assigned this Aug 4, 2022
@srebhan srebhan added plugin/output 1. Request for new output plugins 2. Issues/PRs that are related to out plugins area/telemetry All about OpenTelemetry and other telemetry variants labels Aug 4, 2022
Co-authored-by: Sven Rebhan <36194019+srebhan@users.noreply.github.com>
@povilasv
Copy link
Contributor Author

povilasv commented Aug 4, 2022

@srebhan thanks for taking a look ❤️ , updated the PR with your suggestions :)

@povilasv povilasv force-pushed the openetelemetry-coralogix branch 2 times, most recently from 172e809 to 672cb4f Compare August 4, 2022 12:10
@povilasv povilasv force-pushed the openetelemetry-coralogix branch from 672cb4f to 9127376 Compare August 4, 2022 12:14
@povilasv povilasv requested a review from srebhan August 4, 2022 12:52
Copy link
Member

@srebhan srebhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks good @povilasv. Please use = in the TOML config and make sure that the sample.conf setting-names are reflected in the code. I think I marked all critical locations in the code, but please check again!

povilasv and others added 2 commits August 8, 2022 09:26
Co-authored-by: Sven Rebhan <36194019+srebhan@users.noreply.github.com>
@telegraf-tiger
Copy link
Contributor

telegraf-tiger bot commented Aug 8, 2022

@povilasv
Copy link
Contributor Author

povilasv commented Aug 8, 2022

@srebhan thanks for noting, somehow I missed it. I tested the new code locally and it works :)

Copy link
Member

@srebhan srebhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beautiful. Looks good to me. Thanks for your effort and willingness to help us keeping maintainability @povilasv!

@srebhan srebhan added the ready for final review This pull request has been reviewed and/or tested by multiple users and is ready for a final review. label Aug 8, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@powersj powersj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this!

@powersj powersj merged commit ce2053d into influxdata:master Aug 8, 2022
reimda pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
reimda pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/telemetry All about OpenTelemetry and other telemetry variants feat Improvement on an existing feature such as adding a new setting/mode to an existing plugin plugin/output 1. Request for new output plugins 2. Issues/PRs that are related to out plugins ready for final review This pull request has been reviewed and/or tested by multiple users and is ready for a final review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants