Skip to content
/ fib Public
forked from drujensen/fib

Performance Benchmark of top Github languages

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

ikhoury/fib

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Recursive Fibonacci Benchmark using top languages on Github

Top 10: JavaScript, Java, Python, Ruby, Php, C++, C#, C, Go reference

Others: Crystal, Rust, Swift, Mono, Elixir, Perl, R, Julia, D, Nim

This code performs a recursive fibonacci to the 46th position with the result of 2,971,215,073.

Fibonacci can be written many different ways. The goal of this project is to compare how each language handles the exact same code.

Here is the Ruby version:

def fib(n)
  return 1 if n <= 1
  fib(n - 1) + fib(n - 2)
end

puts fib(46)

Here is the Crystal version:

def fib(n : UInt64)
  return 1_u64 if n <= 1
  fib(n - 1) + fib(n - 2)
end

puts fib(46)

All tests are run on:

  • iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2015)
  • OS: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
  • Processor: 3.2 GHz Intel Core i5
  • Memory: 16 GB 1867 MHz DDR3

Last benchmark was ran on October 1st, 2018

Natively compiled, statically typed

Language Time, s Compile Run
C 4.528 gcc -O3 -o fib fib.c time ./fib
Nim 4.538 nim cpp -d:release fib.nim time ./fib
C++ 4.540 g++ -O3 -o fib fib.cpp time ./fib
Crystal 5.616 crystal build --release fib.cr time ./fib
Cython 5.790 cython --embed -o fib.pyx.c fib.pyx && \
gcc -O3 -o fib fib.pyx.c \
$(pkg-config --cflags --libs python3) time ./fib
Fortran 6.000 gfortran -O3 -o fib fib.f03 time ./fib
Rust 6.401 rustc -O fib.rs time ./fib
D 6.900 ldc2 -O3 -release -flto=full -of=fib fib.d time ./fib
Swift 6.843 swiftc -O -g fib.swift time ./fib
Haskell 7.864 ghc -O3 -o fib fib.hs time ./fib
OCaml 7.889 ocamlopt -O3 -o fib fib.ml time ./fib
Go 10.481 go build fib.go time ./fib
Lisp 13.116 sbcl --load fib.lisp time ./fib

NOTE:

VM compiled bytecode, statically/dynamically typed

Language Time, s Compile Run
Java 7.311 javac Fib.java time java Fib
C# 11.176 dotnet build -c Release -o ./bin time dotnet ./bin/fib.dll
C# (Mono) 11.955 mcs fib.cs time mono fib.exe
Erlang 13.170 erlc +native +'{hipe,[o3]}' fib.erl time erl -noinput -s fib

NOTE: These languages incur a cost for loading the VM that should be taken into consideration when comparing.

VM compiled before execution, mixed/dynamically typed

Language Time, s Run
Dart 10.193 time dart fib.dart
Escript 12.652 time escript fib.es
Julia 13.348 time julia -O3 fib.jl
Elixir* 13.853 time elixir fib.exs
Node 19.277 time node fib.js
Clojure 24.008 time clojure fib.cljc
  • Elixir is using ERL_COMPILER_OPTIONS='[native,{hipe, [o3]}]'

NOTE: These languages include compilation time that should be taken into consideration when comparing.

Interpreted, dynamically typed

Language Time, s Run
Scheme 150.454 time guile fib.scm
Php 198.279 time php fib.php
Ruby 200.168 time ruby fib.rb
Lua 351.117 time lua fib.lua
Python 515.008 time python fib.py
Python3 770.082 time python3 fib.py
Perl 1039.727 time perl fib.pl
R 1796.495 time r -f fib.r
Tcl 2040.860 time tclsh fib.tcl
Perl6 2851.994 time perl6 fib.p6
K DNF time k fib.k
Bash DNF time bash fib.sh

NOTE: Interpreted languages have a startup time cost that should be taken into consideration when comparing.

Optimized code that breaks the benchmark

The code examples provided in the optimized folder use techniques that break the benchmark. They do not perform the same internal tasks as the other examples so are not a good for an apples to apples comparison. They all perform at sub-second response times. It demonstrates that all benchmarks will have some caveat.

Several of these examples add very little changes to the original code that are worth mentioning:

  • The C++ constexpr is using a constexpr which optimizes the recursive call to a constant.
  • The Lisp compiletime shows how you can perform the calculation at compile time. simply add #. before outputing the results.
  • The Python lru_cache is using lru_cache directive with no code changes.
  • The Ruby mem and JS mem are maintaining a simple cache to avoid recalculating the results for that value.

For the fun of it, here are the benchmarks for the optimized versions

Last benchmark was ran on October 05, 2018

Optimized

Language Time, s Compile Run
Nim Constant 0.002 nim cpp -d:release fib_const.nim time ./fib_cont
Perl Memoized 2 0.005 time perl fib-mem2.pl
OCaml TCO 0.005 ocamlopt -O3 -o fib_tail fib_tail.ml time ./fib_tail
Perl Inline 0.006 time perl fib-inline.py
Go Memoized 0.006 go build fib-mem.go time ./fib-mem
Haskell Memoized 0.006 ghc -O3 -o fib_mem fib_mem.hs time ./fib_mem
Nim Memoized 0.006 nim cpp -d:release fib_mem.nim time ./fib_mem
Swift Memoized 0.006 swiftc -O -g fib-mem.swift time ./fib-mem
C++ Constant 0.007 g++-8 -O3 -o fib-const fib-constexpr.cpp time ./fib-const
D Memoized 0.007 ldc2 -O3 -release -flto=full -of=fib-mem fib-mem.d time ./fib-mem
Lisp Compile Time 0.008 sbcl --load fib-compiletime.lisp time ./fib-compiletime
Perl Memoized 0.014 time perl fib-mem.pl
K Memoized 0.055 time k fib-mem.k
Erlang Memoized 0.113 erlc +native +'{hipe,[o3]}' fib_mem.erl time erl -noinput -noshell -s fib_mem
Python Cached 0.116 time python3 fib-cache.py
Lua Memoized 0.121 time lua fib-mem.lua
Escript Memoized 0.136 time escript fib_mem.es
Ruby Memoized 0.183 time ruby fib-mem.rb
Java Iterative 0.199 javac FibOptimized.java time java FibOptimized
Elixir Iterative 0.700 time elixir fib-iterative.exs
Node Memoized 0.835 time node fib-mem.js
Perl6 Memoized 1.005 time perl6 fib-mem.p6
Lisp Local 7.550 sbcl --load fib-local.lisp time ./fib-local

Versions

  • g++ Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.11.45.2)
  • gcc Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.11.45.2)
  • nim Nim Compiler Version 0.18.0 [MacOSX: amd64]
  • crystal Crystal 0.26.1 (2018-08-27) LLVM: 6.0.1
  • cython Cython version 0.28.5
  • gfortan GNU Fortran (Homebrew GCC 8.2.0) 8.2.0
  • rustc 1.29.0
  • lcd2 the LLVM D compiler (1.11.0)
  • swiftc Apple Swift version 4.2 (swiftlang-1000.11.37.1 clang-1000.11.45.1)
  • ghc The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 8.4.3
  • ocaml The OCaml toplevel, version 4.07.0
  • go version go1.11 darwin/amd64
  • lisp SBCL 1.4.11
  • javac 10.0.1
  • dotnet 2.1.4
  • mcs Mono C# compiler version 5.12.0.226
  • erlc 21.1
  • dart Dart VM version: 2.0.0 (Fri Aug 3 10:53:23 2018 +0200)
  • julia version 0.6.3
  • elixir Elixir 1.7.3 (compiled with Erlang/OTP 21)
  • node v9.4.0
  • clojure 1.9.0
  • guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.4
  • php 7.1.16 (cli) (built: Apr 1 2018 13:14:42)
  • ruby 2.5.1p57 (2018-03-29 revision 63029)
  • python 2.7.15
  • python3 3.7.0
  • perl 5, version 26, subversion 2 (v5.26.2)
  • perl 6 This is Rakudo Star version 2018.06 built on MoarVM version 2018.06
  • lua Lua 5.3.5 Copyright (C) 1994-2018 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
  • r version 3.5.0 (2018-04-23)
  • lcd2 the LLVM D compiler (1.11.0)
  • dmd the reference D compiler (2.082.0)
  • ocaml The OCaml toplevel, version 4.07.0
  • ghc The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 8.4.3
  • gfortran GNU Fortran (Homebrew GCC 8.2.0) 8.2.0
  • tchsh 8.5

Caveats

Fibonacci Benchmark

About

Performance Benchmark of top Github languages

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Ruby 39.0%
  • Dockerfile 12.4%
  • Common Lisp 8.3%
  • Java 5.6%
  • Perl 3.4%
  • Erlang 3.2%
  • Other 28.1%